• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胃食管反流病症状治疗后患者的六个月管理——一项挪威的随机前瞻性研究,比较在普通全科医生环境中埃索美拉唑和雷尼替丁治疗策略的成本和有效性。

Six-month management of patients following treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms -- a Norwegian randomized, prospective study comparing the costs and effectiveness of esomeprazole and ranitidine treatment strategies in a general medical practitioners setting.

作者信息

Hansen A N, Wahlqvist P, Jørgensen E, Bergheim R, Fagertun H, Lund H, Moum B

机构信息

Harbitzallèen Legesenter, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Int J Clin Pract. 2005 Jun;59(6):655-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1368-5031.2005.00563.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1368-5031.2005.00563.x
PMID:15924593
Abstract

This study assesses the difference in direct medical costs between on-demand treatment with esomeprazole 20 mg, continuous treatment with esomeprazole 20 mg once-daily and continuous treatment with ranitidine 150 mg twice-daily to prevent symptomatic relapse in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease over 26 weeks. Two hundred eighty-one GP clinics in Norway enrolled 2156 patients to an open, randomized, parallel group, Norwegian society perspective study during 2000-2001. The total direct medical costs of each strategy were 171.9 Euros for on-demand esomeprazole (n = 634), 221.6 Euros for ranitidine (n = 610) and 248.8 Euros for continuous esomeprazole (n = 658). The total costs for on-demand and continuous esomeprazole treatment and ranitidine treatment were 221.5, 286.5 and 295.8 Euros, respectively. The highest proportion of costs was because of the study medication cost in each strategy. The on-demand and continuous treatment strategies with esomeprazole were found to be cost-effective, compared with ranitidine.

摘要

本研究评估了使用20毫克埃索美拉唑按需治疗、每日一次连续使用20毫克埃索美拉唑治疗以及每日两次连续使用150毫克雷尼替丁治疗在预防胃食管反流病患者症状复发方面的直接医疗成本差异,研究周期为26周。2000年至2001年期间,挪威的281家全科诊所招募了2156名患者参与一项开放、随机、平行组、基于挪威社会视角的研究。按需使用埃索美拉唑治疗(n = 634)的每种策略的总直接医疗成本为171.9欧元,雷尼替丁治疗(n = 610)为221.6欧元,连续使用埃索美拉唑治疗(n = 658)为248.8欧元。按需和连续使用埃索美拉唑治疗以及雷尼替丁治疗的总成本分别为221.5欧元、286.5欧元和295.8欧元。每种策略中成本占比最高的是研究药物成本。与雷尼替丁相比,按需和连续使用埃索美拉唑治疗策略被发现具有成本效益。

相似文献

1
Six-month management of patients following treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms -- a Norwegian randomized, prospective study comparing the costs and effectiveness of esomeprazole and ranitidine treatment strategies in a general medical practitioners setting.胃食管反流病症状治疗后患者的六个月管理——一项挪威的随机前瞻性研究,比较在普通全科医生环境中埃索美拉唑和雷尼替丁治疗策略的成本和有效性。
Int J Clin Pract. 2005 Jun;59(6):655-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1368-5031.2005.00563.x.
2
Long-term management of patients with symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease -- a Norwegian randomised prospective study comparing the effects of esomeprazole and ranitidine treatment strategies on health-related quality of life in a general practitioners setting.胃食管反流病症状患者的长期管理——一项挪威随机前瞻性研究,比较在全科医生环境中埃索美拉唑和雷尼替丁治疗策略对健康相关生活质量的影响。
Int J Clin Pract. 2006 Jan;60(1):15-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1368-5031.2006.00768.x.
3
A randomised prospective study comparing the effectiveness of esomeprazole treatment strategies in clinical practice for 6 months in the management of patients with symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease.一项随机前瞻性研究,比较艾司奥美拉唑治疗策略在临床实践中对胃食管反流病症状患者进行6个月管理的有效性。
Int J Clin Pract. 2005 Jun;59(6):665-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1368-5031.2005.00564.x.
4
Costs and efficacy of three different esomeprazole treatment strategies for long-term management of gastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms in primary care.三种不同埃索美拉唑治疗策略在基层医疗中对胃食管反流症状进行长期管理的成本与疗效
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2004 Apr 15;19(8):907-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2004.01916.x.
5
Quality of life in acute and maintenance treatment of non-erosive and mild erosive gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.非糜烂性和轻度糜烂性胃食管反流病急性及维持治疗中的生活质量
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2005 Aug 15;22(4):349-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2005.02558.x.
6
Cost analysis of long-term treatment of patients with symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) with esomeprazole on-demand treatment or esomeprazole continuous treatment: an open, randomized, multicenter study in Switzerland.按需治疗或连续治疗埃索美拉唑治疗有症状胃食管反流病(GERD)患者的长期成本分析:瑞士一项开放、随机、多中心研究。
Value Health. 2009 Mar-Apr;12(2):273-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00452.x. Epub 2008 Sep 9.
7
Esomeprazole 20 mg on-demand is more acceptable to patients than continuous lansoprazole 15 mg in the long-term maintenance of endoscopy-negative gastro-oesophageal reflux patients: the COMMAND Study.在胃镜检查阴性的胃食管反流病患者的长期维持治疗中,按需服用20毫克埃索美拉唑比持续服用15毫克兰索拉唑更易为患者接受:COMMAND研究。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2004 Sep 15;20(6):657-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2004.02155.x.
8
[Long-term treatment of patients with symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease comparing costs and efficacy over 6 months of treatment with Nexium On-Demand Treatment or Nexium continuous treatment. An open, randomised multi-center study].[有症状的胃食管反流病患者的长期治疗:比较耐信按需治疗或耐信持续治疗6个月的成本和疗效。一项开放、随机的多中心研究]
Praxis (Bern 1994). 2006 Mar 29;95(13):483-7. doi: 10.1024/0369-8394.95.13.483.
9
One-week esomeprazole treatment: an effective confirmatory test in patients with suspected gastroesophageal reflux disease.一周的埃索美拉唑治疗:对疑似胃食管反流病患者的有效验证性试验。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2003 Apr;38(4):354-9.
10
The gain in quality-adjusted life months by switching to esomeprazole in those with continued reflux symptoms in primary care: EncomPASS--a cluster-randomized trial.在初级保健中,对于那些持续存在反流症状的患者,转换为埃索美拉唑可获得质量调整生命月数的增加:EncomPASS——一项集群随机试验。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2010 Nov;105(11):2341-6. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2010.368. Epub 2010 Sep 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Economic evaluation of proton pump inhibitors in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review.胃食管反流病患者使用质子泵抑制剂的经济学评价:一项系统综述
BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2024 Dec 20;11(1):e001465. doi: 10.1136/bmjgast-2024-001465.
2
On-demand Versus Continuous Maintenance Treatment With a Proton Pump Inhibitor for Mild Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Prospective Randomized Multicenter Study.质子泵抑制剂按需治疗与持续维持治疗轻度胃食管反流病:一项前瞻性随机多中心研究。
J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2023 Oct 30;29(4):460-469. doi: 10.5056/jnm23130.
3
Strategies for Effective Discontinuation of Proton Pump Inhibitors.
有效停用质子泵抑制剂的策略
Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2018 May 16;20(6):27. doi: 10.1007/s11894-018-0632-y.
4
Discontinuing Long-Term PPI Therapy: Why, With Whom, and How?停止长期使用质子泵抑制剂(PPI)治疗:为什么、针对谁以及如何停药?
Am J Gastroenterol. 2018 Apr;113(4):519-528. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2018.29. Epub 2018 Mar 20.
5
Randomized, multicenter study: on-demand versus continuous maintenance treatment with esomeprazole in patients with non-erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease.随机、多中心研究:埃索美拉唑按需治疗与持续维持治疗非糜烂性胃食管反流病患者的比较
BMC Gastroenterol. 2016 Apr 14;16:48. doi: 10.1186/s12876-016-0448-x.
6
Clinical drug trials in general practice: a 10-year overview of protocols.全科临床药物试验:10 年方案概述。
Trials. 2013 Jun 1;14:162. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-162.
7
On-demand PPI therapy in GERD.胃食管反流病的按需质子泵抑制剂治疗
Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol. 2008 Feb;11(1):35-42. doi: 10.1007/s11938-008-0005-y.
8
Esomeprazole: a review of its use in the management of gastric acid-related diseases in adults.埃索美拉唑:关于其在成人胃酸相关性疾病管理中应用的综述
Drugs. 2008;68(11):1571-607. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200868110-00009.