Hansen A N, Wahlqvist P, Jørgensen E, Bergheim R, Fagertun H, Lund H, Moum B
Harbitzallèen Legesenter, Oslo, Norway.
Int J Clin Pract. 2005 Jun;59(6):655-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1368-5031.2005.00563.x.
This study assesses the difference in direct medical costs between on-demand treatment with esomeprazole 20 mg, continuous treatment with esomeprazole 20 mg once-daily and continuous treatment with ranitidine 150 mg twice-daily to prevent symptomatic relapse in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease over 26 weeks. Two hundred eighty-one GP clinics in Norway enrolled 2156 patients to an open, randomized, parallel group, Norwegian society perspective study during 2000-2001. The total direct medical costs of each strategy were 171.9 Euros for on-demand esomeprazole (n = 634), 221.6 Euros for ranitidine (n = 610) and 248.8 Euros for continuous esomeprazole (n = 658). The total costs for on-demand and continuous esomeprazole treatment and ranitidine treatment were 221.5, 286.5 and 295.8 Euros, respectively. The highest proportion of costs was because of the study medication cost in each strategy. The on-demand and continuous treatment strategies with esomeprazole were found to be cost-effective, compared with ranitidine.
本研究评估了使用20毫克埃索美拉唑按需治疗、每日一次连续使用20毫克埃索美拉唑治疗以及每日两次连续使用150毫克雷尼替丁治疗在预防胃食管反流病患者症状复发方面的直接医疗成本差异,研究周期为26周。2000年至2001年期间,挪威的281家全科诊所招募了2156名患者参与一项开放、随机、平行组、基于挪威社会视角的研究。按需使用埃索美拉唑治疗(n = 634)的每种策略的总直接医疗成本为171.9欧元,雷尼替丁治疗(n = 610)为221.6欧元,连续使用埃索美拉唑治疗(n = 658)为248.8欧元。按需和连续使用埃索美拉唑治疗以及雷尼替丁治疗的总成本分别为221.5欧元、286.5欧元和295.8欧元。每种策略中成本占比最高的是研究药物成本。与雷尼替丁相比,按需和连续使用埃索美拉唑治疗策略被发现具有成本效益。