Wissow Lawrence S, Larson Susan, Anderson Jada, Hadjiisky Elizabeth
Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Pediatrics. 2005 Jun;115(6):1569-78. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1535.
Studies spanning nearly 4 decades demonstrate that doctors ignore or dismiss many patient bids for discussion of psychosocial topics. We sought to understand characteristics of doctors, patients, and visits in which this occurs.
Reanalysis of 167 audiotapes from 2 studies of parent-doctor communication in a pediatric residents' continuity clinic was performed. Tapes included visits by 100 mothers or female guardians to 55 residents who were the children's primary care providers. Coders identified mentions of psychosocial topics and noted the content and the doctor's response. Responses were classified with an adaptation of a previously described, psychoanalytically derived typology of avoidant or discouraging responses.
Discouraging responses occurred in 34 (77%) of 44 discussions that involved corporal punishment and 51 (34%) of 64 discussions that involved other psychosocial topics. The particular topic (parent/family versus routine parenting issue) and how the topic was framed (as a problem versus simply mentioned) were associated with doctors' discouraging responses (OR: 3.07; 95% confidence interval: 1.56-6.05; and OR: 7.57; 95% confidence interval: 3.50-16.44; respectively). Discouraging responses were not related to the doctor's gender, parent's ethnicity, length of the parent-doctor relationship, or doctor's overall interview style (patient-centeredness). Discouraging responses to routine problems tended to be dismissive, but 41% of discouraging responses to parent/family problems were failed attempts to provide advice.
Discouraging responses seem to be related less to doctor or patient characteristics than to the type and acuity of the psychosocial topic. These responses may originate with doctors' discomfort with particular subject areas and thus might be approached with training that combines communication and emotion-handling skills with clinical tools such as Bright Futures in Practice: Mental Health or the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Primary Care.
近40年的研究表明,医生会忽视或拒绝患者许多关于讨论心理社会话题的诉求。我们试图了解出现这种情况时医生、患者及诊疗过程的特征。
对两项关于儿科住院医师连续性门诊中家长与医生沟通情况的研究中的167份录音带进行重新分析。这些录音带记录了100位母亲或女性监护人对55位担任儿童初级保健提供者的住院医师的诊疗过程。编码人员识别出提及的心理社会话题,并记录其内容及医生的反应。根据先前描述的、源自精神分析的回避或令人气馁反应类型学改编版,对医生的反应进行分类。
在涉及体罚的44次讨论中,有34次(77%)出现了令人气馁的反应;在涉及其他心理社会话题的64次讨论中,有51次(34%)出现了此类反应。特定话题(家长/家庭问题与日常育儿问题)以及话题的表述方式(作为一个问题提出还是只是简单提及)与医生令人气馁的反应相关(比值比分别为:3.07;95%置信区间:1.56 - 6.05;以及7.57;95%置信区间:3.50 - 16.44)。令人气馁的反应与医生性别、家长种族、医患关系时长或医生的整体问诊风格(以患者为中心程度)无关。对日常问题的令人气馁反应往往是不屑一顾,但对家长/家庭问题的令人气馁反应中有41%是提供建议的失败尝试。
令人气馁的反应似乎与医生或患者的特征关系较小,而与心理社会话题的类型和严重程度有关。这些反应可能源于医生对特定主题领域的不适,因此或许可以通过将沟通和情绪处理技能与《实践中的光明未来:心理健康》或《国际疾病分类(第10版,初级保健)》等临床工具相结合的培训来解决。