Does curettage without adjuvant therapy provide low recurrence rates in giant-cell tumors of bone?

UNLABELLED

Adjuvant treatment or filling agents have been recommended for reducing recurrence rates of giant-cell tumors of bone. However, reports of low recurrence rates without either caused us to question this concept. We retrospectively reviewed 193 patients treated during a 27-year period, comparing our results with historic controls. One hundred thirty-seven patients had curettage as a primary treatment, and of these, 26 (19%) had local recurrences. The local recurrence rate of giant-cell tumors confined to bone (Campanacci Grades I and II) was only 7% compared with 29% in tumors with extraosseous extension (Campanacci Grade III). Six patients (4%) had a fracture after curettage. Twenty-nine patients who were referred to us with local recurrences after treatment elsewhere had curettage, and 10 (34%) of these patients had local recurrences develop. Twenty-seven patients had excision as their primary treatment, and two (7%) of these patients had local recurrence develop. We recommend primary curettage for intraosseous giant-cell tumors without adjuvant treatment or filling agents, but tumors with soft tissue extension or with local recurrence require more aggressive treatment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic study, Level IV (case series--no, or historical control group). See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.