Moorthy K, Munz Y, Dosis A, Bello F, Chang A, Darzi A
Department of Surgical Oncology and Technology, Imperial College, St. Mary's Hospital, W2 1NY, London.
Surg Endosc. 2004 Nov;18(11):1608-12. doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-9312-5. Epub 2004 Oct 11.
The assessment of technical skills should provide objective feedback and judge suitability of progress during training. The aim of this study was to validate two objective assessment techniques for laparoscopic suturing and demonstrate a correlation between them.
Six experts, seven surgeons skilled in laparoscopic suturing, and 13 with no laparoscopic suturing skills were asked to place two or three intracorporeal sutures on a synthetic suture pad. The latter group was given video-based instructions prior to the execution of the sutures. Ergonomic conditions were standardized for all subjects. The procedures were recorded on videotape and two blinded observers rated the first suture of each subject on a 29-point checklist. A motion analysis system, Imperial College Surgical Assessment Device, was used to assess psychomotor skills.
There was a significant difference in the time taken (p = 0.000) and total path length (p = 0.000) per suture across the groups. There were also a significant difference in the total checklist score (p = 0.000) and its individual categories. The was a strong correlation between the total path length and the total checklist score (coefficient, 0.78; p < 0.001).
A combination of the motion analysis system and the checklist would make the process of formative feedback during the learning of intracorporeal suturing objective and comprehensive.
技术技能评估应提供客观反馈,并判断培训期间进展的适宜性。本研究的目的是验证两种用于腹腔镜缝合的客观评估技术,并证明它们之间的相关性。
邀请6名专家、7名熟练掌握腹腔镜缝合技术的外科医生和13名无腹腔镜缝合技术的人员在合成缝合垫上进行两到三次体内缝合。后一组在进行缝合前观看了基于视频的指导。对所有受试者的人体工程学条件进行了标准化。手术过程被录制在录像带上,两名不知情的观察者根据一份29分的检查表对每个受试者的第一针进行评分。使用运动分析系统——帝国理工学院手术评估设备来评估心理运动技能。
各组之间每针的耗时(p = 0.000)和总路径长度(p = 0.000)存在显著差异。检查表总分及其各个类别也存在显著差异。总路径长度与检查表总分之间存在很强的相关性(系数,0.78;p < 0.001)。
运动分析系统和检查表相结合将使体内缝合学习过程中的形成性反馈过程客观且全面。