Law W L, Chu K W, Tung H M
Department of Surgery, University of Hong Kong Medical Centre, Queen Mary Hospital, Pokfulam, Hong Kong.
Surg Endosc. 2004 Nov;18(11):1592-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-9249-8. Epub 2004 Oct 11.
Laparoscopic resection has been shown to be a feasible option in patients with colorectal diseases. However, there have been only a few studies on laparoscopic resection for rectal neoplasm. This report aimed to evaluate the early outcomes of patients treated by laparoscopic rectal resection for neoplasm.
From May 2000 to April 2003, 100 patients underwent laparoscopic resection for rectal neoplasm with mesorectal excision. Data on the patients' demographics, operative details, and outcomes were collected prospectively. In those with successful laparoscopic resection, comparison was made between patients with predominantly intracorporeal surgery (ICS) and those with anterior resection performed with extracorporeal rectal transection and anastomosis following intracorporeal bowel mobilization and vessel ligation (IECS).
Sixty-six men and 34 women (median age, 69 years; range, 40-85) were included. Operations included 91 anterior resections, eight abdominoperineal resections, and one Hartmann's procedure. Conversion was required in 15 patients and no conversion was needed in patients treated by laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection. One patient died 30 days after surgery because of liver failure. Postoperative complications occurred in 31 patients. Among them, three had anastomotic leakage and all of them could be treated conservatively. Reoperation was required in one patient with intestinal obstruction. Patients with conversion were found to have significantly more blood loss, longer time to resume diet, a longer hospital stay, and a higher morbidity rate when compared to those with successful laparoscopic surgery. Among those with successful laparoscopic procedures, no difference was observed between patients with ICS (n = 57) and those with IECS (n = 28), except that a shorter incision and less blood loss were found in patients in the former group.
Laparoscopic rectal resection with mesorectal dissection is feasible. The operating mortality and reoperation rates were low. Conversion was associated with an increased morbidity rate, leading to a longer hospital stay. Laparoscopically assisted anterior resection with rectal transection by a transverse stapler through the abdominal incision produced similar results when compared to a procedure that was predominantly intracorporeally performed.
腹腔镜切除术已被证明是治疗结直肠疾病患者的一种可行选择。然而,关于腹腔镜直肠肿瘤切除术的研究较少。本报告旨在评估腹腔镜直肠肿瘤切除术患者的早期疗效。
2000年5月至2003年4月,100例患者接受了腹腔镜直肠肿瘤切除术并进行了直肠系膜切除。前瞻性收集患者的人口统计学数据、手术细节和疗效。在成功进行腹腔镜切除术的患者中,对主要采用体内手术(ICS)的患者与在体内肠管游离和血管结扎后采用体外直肠横断和吻合进行前切除术(IECS)的患者进行比较。
纳入66例男性和34例女性(中位年龄69岁;范围40 - 85岁)。手术包括91例前切除术、8例腹会阴联合切除术和1例Hartmann手术。15例患者需要中转手术,腹腔镜腹会阴联合切除术患者无需中转。1例患者术后30天因肝衰竭死亡。31例患者发生术后并发症。其中3例发生吻合口漏,均经保守治疗。1例肠梗阻患者需要再次手术。与成功进行腹腔镜手术的患者相比,中转手术的患者失血量明显更多、恢复饮食时间更长、住院时间更长且发病率更高。在成功进行腹腔镜手术的患者中,ICS组(n = 57)和IECS组(n = 28)之间未观察到差异,只是前一组患者的切口较短且失血量较少。
腹腔镜直肠系膜切除术是可行的。手术死亡率和再次手术率较低。中转手术与发病率增加相关,导致住院时间延长。与主要在体内进行的手术相比,通过腹部切口使用横向吻合器进行直肠横断的腹腔镜辅助前切除术产生了相似的结果。