Pascoal A, Lawinski C P, Mackenzie A, Tabakov S, Lewis C A
ME&P, King's College London, London, UK.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2005;114(1-3):273-7. doi: 10.1093/rpd/nch572.
Image quality (IQ) and effective dose for chest radiography was compared for four digital imaging systems that used three different detector technologies: a-Si/TFT flat-panel detector (FPD), scanning-slot/charge-coupled device (CCD) and photostimuable phosphor (PSP). On each system a phantom was exposed at 125 kV(p) for automatic exposure control (AEC) and 2, 4 and 8 Gy receptor dose using identical geometrical conditions. All images were scored as softcopy images by three observers. The effective dose was calculated for each exposure condition. For AEC, superior IQ was observed for the GE FPD compared with all the other systems, which showed similar IQ performance. For all systems the entrance surface dose associated with AEC was within the European recommendations but variations in the effective dose were observed between the four systems. For identical receptor dose levels superior IQ was observed with the FPDs. Thorascan was noted for its low effective dose and Agfa CR was associated with the highest effective dose. FPD systems showed a better overall performance, followed by the CCD and PSP systems.
比较了使用三种不同探测器技术的四种数字成像系统用于胸部X线摄影的图像质量(IQ)和有效剂量:非晶硅/薄膜晶体管平板探测器(FPD)、扫描槽/电荷耦合器件(CCD)和光激励荧光体(PSP)。在每个系统上,使用相同的几何条件,在125 kV(p)下对体模进行自动曝光控制(AEC)以及2、4和8 Gy的受体剂量曝光。所有图像由三名观察者作为软拷贝图像进行评分。计算每种曝光条件下的有效剂量。对于AEC,与所有其他系统相比,GE FPD的IQ更高,其他系统的IQ表现相似。对于所有系统,与AEC相关的入射表面剂量在欧洲建议范围内,但四个系统之间的有效剂量存在差异。对于相同的受体剂量水平,FPD的IQ更高。Thorascan因其低有效剂量而受到关注,Agfa CR的有效剂量最高。FPD系统总体性能更好,其次是CCD和PSP系统。