Parry Steve W, Steen I Nick, Baptist Mary, Kenny Rose Anne
Falls and Syncope Service and Institute for Ageing and Health, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Jun 7;45(11):1840-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.02.060.
The goal of this study was to compare the clinical characteristics of patients with carotid sinus syndrome who presented with falls with those who presented with syncope.
Carotid sinus syndrome presents with both falls and syncope. The reasons for this differential presentation are unknown, but amnesia for loss of consciousness may be the underlying cause.
Two groups of 34 consecutive patients with carotid sinus syndrome as the sole cause of falls and syncope were recruited. Cognitive function and clinical characteristics were compared between the two groups.
Syncopal subjects with carotid sinus syndrome were more likely to be older males (18 [53%] vs. 7 [21%] years; p = 0.006) with a longer duration of symptoms (27.9 vs. 13.3 months; p = 0.009) and more soft tissue injuries (19 [56%] vs. 9 [26%]; p = 0.03). Duration of asystole during carotid sinus massage was similar in both groups (5.1 vs. 5.4 s; p = 0.42), but witnessed amnesia for loss of consciousness was more frequent in fallers than those with syncope (21 [95%] vs. 4 [12%]; p < 0.001). Clinical characteristics and cognitive function were otherwise similar in both groups.
Patients with carotid sinus syndrome have similar rates of witnessed loss of consciousness during laboratory testing regardless of symptoms. However, those presenting with falls are far less likely to perceive any disturbance of consciousness than those with syncope, showing for the first time the manner in which such patients manifest symptoms. Cognitive impairment does not explain the amnesia for loss of consciousness seen in fallers with carotid sinus syndrome.
本研究旨在比较以跌倒为表现的颈动脉窦综合征患者与以晕厥为表现的患者的临床特征。
颈动脉窦综合征可表现为跌倒和晕厥。这种不同表现的原因尚不清楚,但意识丧失后的失忆可能是潜在原因。
招募两组各34例连续的以颈动脉窦综合征为跌倒和晕厥唯一原因的患者。比较两组的认知功能和临床特征。
患有颈动脉窦综合征的晕厥患者更可能是老年男性(平均年龄18岁[53%] vs. 7岁[21%];p = 0.006),症状持续时间更长(27.9个月 vs. 13.3个月;p = 0.009),软组织损伤更多(19例[56%] vs. 9例[26%];p = 0.03)。两组在颈动脉窦按摩期间的心脏停搏持续时间相似(5.1秒 vs. 5.4秒;p = 0.42),但跌倒患者意识丧失后的失忆比晕厥患者更常见(21例[95%] vs. 4例[12%];p < 0.001)。两组的临床特征和认知功能在其他方面相似。
无论症状如何,患有颈动脉窦综合征的患者在实验室检查中意识丧失的发生率相似。然而,与晕厥患者相比,以跌倒为表现的患者意识到意识障碍的可能性要小得多,首次展示了这类患者表现症状的方式。认知障碍并不能解释患有颈动脉窦综合征的跌倒患者意识丧失后的失忆现象。