Hickman Zachary A, Reid Brian J
School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK.
Environ Pollut. 2005 Nov;138(2):299-306. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2005.03.010.
This study correlated extractabilities of 37 d aged phenanthrene residues in four dissimilar soils with the fraction that was available for earthworm (Lumbricus rubellus) accumulation and microorganism (Pseudomonas sp.) mineralisation. Extractability was determined using two established techniques, namely, (1) a water based extraction using CO(2) equilibrated water and (2) an aqueous based hydroxypropyl-beta-cyclodextrin (HPCD) extraction. Results showed no relationship between earthworm accumulation and phenanthrene extractability using either HPCD (r(2)=0.07; slope=-4.76; n=5) or the water based extraction (r(2)=0.31; slope=-5.34; n=5). Earthworm accumulation was overestimated by both techniques. In contrast, the fraction of phenanthrene extractable using both the HPCD technique and the water based extraction correlated strongly with microbial mineralisation. However, the slopes of these linear relationships were 0.48 (r(2)=0.96; n=10), and 0.99 (r(2)=0.88; n=10) for the water based extraction and HPCD, respectively. Thus, the HPCD extraction provided values that were numerically close to the mineralisation values, whilst the water based extraction values were approximately half the mineralisation values. It is submitted that HPCD extraction provided an appropriate method of assessing the fraction of contaminant available for microbial mineralisation in these dissimilar soils.
本研究将四种不同土壤中37天龄菲残留的可提取性与可被蚯蚓(赤子爱胜蚓)积累和微生物(假单胞菌属)矿化的部分进行了关联。使用两种既定技术测定可提取性,即:(1)使用二氧化碳平衡水的水基萃取法,以及(2)基于水的羟丙基-β-环糊精(HPCD)萃取法。结果表明,无论是使用HPCD(r² = 0.07;斜率 = -4.76;n = 5)还是水基萃取法(r² = 0.31;斜率 = -5.34;n = 5),蚯蚓积累与菲的可提取性之间均无关联。两种技术均高估了蚯蚓的积累量。相比之下,使用HPCD技术和水基萃取法可提取的菲部分与微生物矿化密切相关。然而,水基萃取法和HPCD的这些线性关系的斜率分别为0.48(r² = 0.96;n = 10)和0.99(r² = 0.88;n = 10)。因此,HPCD萃取法得到的值在数值上接近矿化值,而水基萃取法的值约为矿化值的一半。有人认为,HPCD萃取法为评估这些不同土壤中可用于微生物矿化的污染物部分提供了一种合适的方法。