Soegaard Rikke, Christensen Finn B, Lauerberg Ida, Bünger Cody E
Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, University Hospital of Aarhus, Nørrebrogade 44, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark.
Eur Spine J. 2006 May;15(5):648-56. doi: 10.1007/s00586-005-0884-8. Epub 2005 Jun 4.
Very few studies have investigated the effects or costs of rehabilitation regimens following lumbar spinal fusion. The effectiveness of in-hospital rehabilitation regimens has substantial impact on patients' demands in the primary health care sector. The aim of this study was to investigate patient-articulated demands to the primary health care sector following lumbar spinal fusion and three different in-hospital rehabilitation regimens in a prospective, randomized study with a 2-year follow-up. Ninety patients were randomized 3 months post lumbar spinal fusion to either a 'video' group (one-time oral instruction by a physiotherapist and patients were then issued a video for home exercise), or a 'café' group (video regimen with the addition of three café meetings with other fusion-operated patients) or a 'training' group (exercise therapy; physiotherapist-guided; two times a week for 8 weeks). Register data of service utilization in the primary health care sector were collected from the time of randomization through 24 months postsurgery. Costs of in-hospital protocols were estimated and the service utilization in the primary health care sector and its cost were analyzed. A significant difference (P=0.023) in number of contacts was found among groups at 2-year follow-up. Within the periods of 3-6 months and 7-12 months postoperatively, the experimental groups required less than half the amount of care within the primary health care sector as compared to the video group (P=0.001 and P=0.008). The incremental costs of the café regimen respectively, the training regimen were compensated by cost savings in the primary health care sector, at ratios of 4.70 (95% CI 4.64; 4.77) and 1.70 (95% CI 1.68; 1.72). This study concludes that a low-cost biopsychosocial rehabilitation regimen significantly reduces service utilization in the primary health care sector as compared to the usual regimen and a training exercise regimen. The results stress the importance of a cognitive element of coping in a rehabilitation program.
极少有研究调查过腰椎融合术后康复方案的效果或成本。住院康复方案的有效性对患者在初级卫生保健部门的需求有重大影响。本研究的目的是在一项为期2年随访的前瞻性随机研究中,调查腰椎融合术后患者对初级卫生保健部门的明确需求以及三种不同的住院康复方案。90例患者在腰椎融合术后3个月被随机分为“视频”组(由物理治疗师进行一次性口头指导,然后为患者发放家庭锻炼视频)、“咖啡馆”组(视频方案加上与其他接受融合手术的患者进行三次咖啡馆会面)或“训练”组(运动疗法;由物理治疗师指导;每周两次,共8周)。收集从随机分组时到术后24个月期间初级卫生保健部门的服务利用登记数据。估算住院方案的成本,并分析初级卫生保健部门的服务利用情况及其成本。在2年随访时,各组之间的接触次数存在显著差异(P = 0.023)。在术后3至6个月和7至12个月期间,与视频组相比,实验组在初级卫生保健部门所需的护理量不到其一半(P = 0.001和P = 0.008)。“咖啡馆”方案和“训练”方案的增量成本分别由初级卫生保健部门的成本节省所补偿,补偿比例分别为4.70(95%CI 4.64;4.77)和1.70(95%CI 1.68;1.72)。本研究得出结论,与常规方案和训练运动方案相比,低成本的生物心理社会康复方案显著降低了初级卫生保健部门的服务利用。结果强调了康复计划中应对认知要素的重要性。