Christensen Finn B, Laurberg Ida, Bünger Cody E
Spine Section, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Hospital of Aarhus, Denmark.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Dec 1;28(23):2561-9. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000097890.96524.A1.
A prospective, randomized, clinical study with a 2-year follow-up.
To analyze the effect of three different rehabilitation strategies for lumbar spinal fusion patients.
Fifteen percent to 40% of lumbar spinal fusion patients are not expected to improve significantly over a 2-year period. Optimization of present forms of rehabilitation could possibly further improve the outcome.
Between 1996 and 1999, 90 patients who had undergone lumbar spinal fusion were 3 months after surgery randomized to one of three different rehabilitation groups. Video group participants watched a video of exercises for training and were subsequently and only once provided instruction regarding their use. The back-café group was provided the same program as the video group, but as a supplement met with a back-café with other fusion-operated patients three times over an 8-week period. The training group was provided physical therapy training twice weekly for 8 weeks. Functional outcome was evaluated at 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery by use of the low back pain rating scale and a questionnaire covering daily functions, work status, and a patient's contact with the primary sector.
By 2-year follow-up, the back-café and video groups had less pain compared with the training group (P < 0.03). The back-café group was better at performing daily functions such as carrying bags of market items (P < 0.01), getting up from a chair (P < 0.01), and ascending staircases (P < 0.01) compared with the video and training groups. More in the back-café group resumed working after surgery compared with the two other groups (P < 0.04). The video group had significantly more contacts with general practitioners, physical therapists, and so on compared with the back-café and training groups (P < 0.001).
The patients in the back-café group were significantly better at accomplishing a succession of daily tasks compared with the video and training groups 2 years after lumbar spinal fusion. At the 2-year follow-up the training group had a significant pain problem compared with the video and back-café groups. The video group had significantly more treatment demands outside the hospital system. This study demonstrates the relevance of the inclusion of coping schemes and questions the role of intensive exercises in a rehabilitation program for spinal fusion patients.
一项前瞻性、随机、临床研究,随访期为2年。
分析三种不同康复策略对腰椎融合术患者的影响。
预计15%至40%的腰椎融合术患者在2年内不会有显著改善。优化现有的康复形式可能会进一步改善治疗效果。
1996年至1999年期间,90例行腰椎融合术的患者在术后3个月被随机分为三个不同的康复组。视频组参与者观看锻炼视频进行训练,随后仅接受一次关于视频使用的指导。后咖啡馆组接受与视频组相同的项目,但作为补充,在8周内与后咖啡馆的其他融合手术患者会面三次。训练组每周接受两次物理治疗训练,为期8周。术后6个月、12个月和24个月,使用下腰痛评分量表和涵盖日常功能、工作状态以及患者与基层医疗机构接触情况的问卷评估功能结局。
到2年随访时,后咖啡馆组和视频组的疼痛程度低于训练组(P < 0.03)。与视频组和训练组相比,后咖啡馆组在执行诸如搬运市场物品袋(P < 0.01)、从椅子上起身(P < 0.01)和上楼梯(P < 0.01)等日常功能方面表现更好。与其他两组相比,后咖啡馆组术后恢复工作的人数更多(P < 0.04)。与后咖啡馆组和训练组相比,视频组与全科医生、物理治疗师等的接触明显更多(P < 0.001)。
与视频组和训练组相比,腰椎融合术后2年,后咖啡馆组患者在完成一系列日常任务方面明显更出色。在2年随访时,与视频组和后咖啡馆组相比,训练组存在明显的疼痛问题。视频组在医院系统外的治疗需求明显更多。本研究证明了纳入应对方案的相关性,并对强化锻炼在脊柱融合术患者康复计划中的作用提出了质疑。