Suppr超能文献

创伤并非随机发生。在15110名儿童队列中,损伤发生具有可预测的节律模式。

Trauma does not happen at random. Predictable rhythm pattern of injury occurrence in a cohort of 15,110 children.

作者信息

Reinberg Olivier, Lutz Nicolas, Reinberg Alain, Mechkouri Mohamed

机构信息

Department of Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital of Lausanne (CHUV), CH 1011-Lausanne, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Pediatr Surg. 2005 May;40(5):819-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2005.01.050.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Several adult chronobiologic studies have shown that accidents do not occur at random. Comparing a large cohort of injured children with uninjured children living in an urban setting, we evaluated the rhythmicity of pediatric injury occurrence.

METHODS

A data review of a prospective cohort study of child trauma over an 8-year period was recorded in a Swiss urban setting. Chronological and demographic information of preschool as well as school-aged injured children were compared with a similar sample of children assessed in the emergency department for nontraumatic events.

RESULTS

Statistically significant circadian rhythms of injury occurrence were detected with a peak around 4 pm . No sex- or age-related differences were detected between preschool and school-aged children. Type of activity and place of occurrence revealed statistically significant differences in the circadian rhythm of trauma occurrence. No weekly rhythm was validated. A circannual rhythm was validated with a peak on June 14 (+/-10 days).

CONCLUSIONS

Pediatric trauma did not occur at random. Circadian rhythms of pediatric trauma were not influenced by age, sex, or motor vehicle traffic load. Specific circadian and circannual pattern of injury occurrence in children could influence safety campaigns and prevention programs, as well as optimize workforce distribution in medical facilities.

摘要

背景

多项成人时间生物学研究表明,事故并非随机发生。通过比较一大群受伤儿童和生活在城市环境中的未受伤儿童,我们评估了儿童受伤发生的节律性。

方法

在瑞士城市环境中记录了一项为期8年的儿童创伤前瞻性队列研究的数据回顾。将学龄前及学龄期受伤儿童的时间顺序和人口统计学信息与在急诊科接受非创伤性事件评估的类似儿童样本进行比较。

结果

检测到受伤发生具有统计学意义的昼夜节律,高峰时间约为下午4点。学龄前儿童和学龄期儿童之间未检测到与性别或年龄相关的差异。活动类型和发生地点在创伤发生的昼夜节律方面显示出统计学意义的差异。未验证到每周节律。验证到年节律,高峰时间为6月14日(±10天)。

结论

儿童创伤并非随机发生。儿童创伤的昼夜节律不受年龄、性别或机动车交通负荷的影响。儿童受伤发生的特定昼夜和年模式可能会影响安全宣传活动和预防计划,以及优化医疗设施中的劳动力分配。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验