• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在资源受限环境下植入式心脏复律除颤器决策的向下授权:床边定量配给的陷阱

Downward delegation of implantable cardioverter defibrillator decision-making in a restricted-resource environment: the pitfalls of bedside rationing.

作者信息

Simpson Christopher S, Hoffmaster Barry, Dorian Paul

机构信息

Arrhythmia Service (Cardiology), Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.

出版信息

Can J Cardiol. 2005 May 15;21(7):595-9.

PMID:15940358
Abstract

Implantable cardioverter defibrillators have been shown to reduce all-cause mortality in some patient populations at risk of sudden death. New Canadian guidelines recommend implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy for these patients. However, the need for these devices exceeds the funded volumes in many Canadian jurisdictions. As a result, rationing of this resource has been necessary. While rationing at the macro (Ministry of Health) and meso (hospital) levels has achieved some level of acceptance by society, the responsibility for the decisions taken at the micro (individual) patient level actually rests with the physician at the bedside. This 'bedside rationing' creates a moral dilemma for physicians, who are torn between their traditional fiduciary role as 'patient advocate' and the competing role of 'gatekeeper'. This 'downward delegation' of rationing decision-making obscures the reality that rationing occurs, and encourages covert, opaque and inconsistent approaches. The remedy is the development of fair, legitimate procedures for making rationing decisions that include guidelines that structure and constrain those decisions. Macro- and meso-level stakeholders must also recognize and take responsibility for their part in restricting resources in a broadly inclusive and transparent process.

摘要

植入式心脏复律除颤器已被证明可降低某些有猝死风险患者群体的全因死亡率。加拿大新指南建议对这些患者采用植入式心脏复律除颤器治疗。然而,在加拿大许多司法管辖区,对这些设备的需求超过了资金支持的数量。因此,必须对这种资源进行配给。虽然在宏观(卫生部)和中观(医院)层面的配给已在一定程度上为社会所接受,但微观(个体)患者层面决策的责任实际上落在了床边的医生身上。这种“床边配给”给医生带来了道德困境,他们在作为“患者代言人”的传统受托角色和“守门人”这一相互冲突的角色之间左右为难。这种配给决策的“向下委托”掩盖了配给发生的现实,并助长了隐蔽、不透明和不一致的做法。补救办法是制定公平、合理的配给决策程序,包括构建和约束这些决策的指南。宏观和中观层面的利益相关者也必须认识到并为他们在广泛包容和透明的过程中限制资源所起的作用承担责任。

相似文献

1
Downward delegation of implantable cardioverter defibrillator decision-making in a restricted-resource environment: the pitfalls of bedside rationing.在资源受限环境下植入式心脏复律除颤器决策的向下授权:床边定量配给的陷阱
Can J Cardiol. 2005 May 15;21(7):595-9.
2
[Extent and impact of bedside rationing in German hospitals: results of a representative survey among physicians].[德国医院床边资源分配的程度及影响:医生代表性调查结果]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2009 Jun;134(24):1261-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1225273. Epub 2009 Jun 4.
3
Bedside rationing by health practitioners: a case study in a Ugandan hospital.医疗从业者的床边资源分配:乌干达一家医院的案例研究
Med Decis Making. 2007 Jan-Feb;27(1):44-52. doi: 10.1177/0272989X06297397.
4
A focus on when and when not to use antiarrhythmic drugs in treating ventricular arrhythmias and indications for the use of automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.关注治疗室性心律失常时抗心律失常药物的使用时机及禁忌,以及植入式自动心脏复律除颤器的使用指征。
Geriatrics. 2008 Aug;63(8):20-8.
5
Implantable cardioverter/defibrillator therapy: the meaning of terms.
Can J Cardiol. 2000 Oct;16(10):1325-6.
6
Minnesota public opinion on health care resource allocation.
Minn Med. 1994 Nov;77(11):19-23.
7
Risk assessment for defibrillator therapy: Il Trittico.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Sep 18;50(12):1158-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.05.038. Epub 2007 Sep 4.
8
Administrative gatekeeping - a third way between unrestricted patient advocacy and bedside rationing.行政把关——无限制的患者权益维护与床边配给之间的第三条道路。
Bioethics. 2009 Jun;23(5):311-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00652.x. Epub 2008 Apr 11.
9
Improving financial and patient outcomes: the future of demand management.改善财务和患者治疗效果:需求管理的未来。
Healthc Financ Manage. 1997 Aug;51(8):43-4.
10
[Prophylactic use of cardiac implantable defibrillators in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction: how to deal with decision making among guidelines, clinical practice, ethical problems, and limited economic resources].
G Ital Cardiol (Rome). 2008 May;9(5):338-54.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and feasibility testing of decision support for patients who are candidates for a prophylactic implantable defibrillator: a study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial.预防性植入式心脏除颤器候选患者决策支持的开发与可行性测试:一项试点随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2013 Oct 22;14:346. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-346.
2
Implantable cardioverter defibrillators work--so why aren't we using them?植入式心脏复律除颤器是有效的——那我们为什么不使用它们呢?
CMAJ. 2007 Jul 3;177(1):49-51. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.070470.
3
Universal access -- but when? Treating the right patient at the right time: access to electrophysiology services in Canada.
全民可及——但何时实现?在正确的时间治疗正确的患者:加拿大的电生理服务可及性。
Can J Cardiol. 2006 Jul;22(9):741-6. doi: 10.1016/s0828-282x(06)70289-6.