Suppr超能文献

水性分流器。莫尔滕诺分流器与肖基特分流器的比较。

Aqueous shunts. Molteno versus Schocket.

作者信息

Wilson R P, Cantor L, Katz L J, Schmidt C M, Steinmann W C, Allee S

机构信息

Glaucoma Service, Wills Eye Hospital, Philadelphia, PA 19107.

出版信息

Ophthalmology. 1992 May;99(5):672-6; discussion 676-8. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(92)31911-6.

Abstract

The authors conducted a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial to test whether the Schocket shunt with a larger shunt reservoir surface area would provide a lower final intraocular pressure than the double-plate Molteno implant. However, the Molteno implant produced a statistically lower intraocular pressure at 6 months compared with the Schocket shunt. Postoperative visual acuity, glaucoma medications, and complications were not statistically different.

摘要

作者进行了一项多中心、随机对照试验,以测试分流储液器表面积更大的肖基特分流器是否比双板莫尔托诺植入物产生更低的最终眼压。然而,与肖基特分流器相比,莫尔托诺植入物在6个月时眼压在统计学上更低。术后视力、青光眼药物治疗及并发症在统计学上无差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验