Lori Franco, Pollard R B, Whitman L, Bakare N, Blick G, Shalit P, Foli A, Peterson D, Tennenberg A, Schrader S, Rashbaum B, Farthing C, Herman D, Norris D, Greiger P, Frank I, Groff A, Lova L, Asmuth D, Lisziewicz J
Research Institute for Genetic and Human Therapy (RIGHT), IRCCS Policlinico S. Matteo, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2005 Apr;21(4):263-72. doi: 10.1089/aid.2005.21.263.
The goal of this study was to optimize the hydroxyurea dosage in HIV-infected patients, and to minimize the toxicity and maximize the antiviral efficacy of the hydroxyurea-didanosine combination. In a randomized, open-label study (RIGHT 702, a multicenter trial performed in private and institutional practices), three daily doses (600 microg, 800-900 microg, and 1200 microg) of hydroxyurea were administered in combination with didanosine and stavudine to 115 chronically HIV-infected patients, one-third antiretroviral drug naive, with viremia between 5000 and 200,000 copies/ml regardless of CD4+ cell count. The primary efficacy end point was the proportion of patients with plasma HIV-1 RNA levels below 400 copies/ml after 24 weeks of therapy. In the RIGHT 702 intent-to-treat population the lowest (600 mg) dose of hydroxyurea was better tolerated, associated with fewer adverse events, and more potent by all efficacy parameters, including the primary end point (76 versus 60% patients with viremia<400 copies/ml at week 24 for the 600-mg and 800- to 900-mg dose groups, respectively; p=0.027), the mean area under the curve (60.3 versus 65.8; p=0.016), and the mean log10 decrease (-1.95 versus -0.77; p=0.001). Patients receiving 600 mg of hydroxyurea daily also had the highest CD4+ cell count, CD4+/CD8+ cell ratio, and lowest CD8+ cell count and percentage (p=0.035). The RIGHT 702 trial provides an explanation for the increased toxicity and decreased efficacy of hydroxyurea when it was used at high dosage (1200 mg daily). At the optimal dosage of 600 mg daily, hydroxyurea, in combination with didanosine, deserves reevaluation for the long-term management of HIV/AIDS worldwide, because of its excellent resistance profile, durability, and affordability.
本研究的目的是优化羟基脲在HIV感染患者中的剂量,使羟基脲与去羟肌苷联合用药的毒性降至最低,并使抗病毒疗效最大化。在一项随机、开放标签研究(RIGHT 702,一项在私人诊所和机构开展的多中心试验)中,将每日三个剂量(600微克、800 - 900微克和1200微克)的羟基脲与去羟肌苷和司他夫定联合应用于115例慢性HIV感染患者,其中三分之一为初治抗逆转录病毒药物患者,无论CD4 +细胞计数如何,病毒血症水平在5000至200,000拷贝/毫升之间。主要疗效终点是治疗24周后血浆HIV - 1 RNA水平低于400拷贝/毫升的患者比例。在RIGHT 702意向性治疗人群中,最低剂量(600毫克)的羟基脲耐受性更好,不良事件更少,并且在所有疗效参数方面更有效,包括主要终点(600毫克剂量组和800至900毫克剂量组在第24周时病毒血症<400拷贝/毫升的患者分别为76%和60%;p = 0.027)、曲线下平均面积(60.3对65.8;p = 0.016)以及平均log10下降值(-1.95对-0.77;p = 0.001)。每日接受600毫克羟基脲治疗的患者还具有最高的CD4 +细胞计数、CD4 +/CD8 +细胞比值,以及最低的CD8 +细胞计数和百分比(p = 0.035)。RIGHT 702试验解释了高剂量(每日12,00毫克)使用羟基脲时毒性增加和疗效降低的原因。由于其出色的耐药性、持久性和可承受性,对于全球范围内HIV/AIDS的长期管理,每日600毫克的最佳剂量的羟基脲与去羟肌苷联合用药值得重新评估。