Suppr超能文献

作为有害功能障碍的疾病:对《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版修订本中精神障碍定义的概念性批判

Disorder as harmful dysfunction: a conceptual critique of DSM-III-R's definition of mental disorder.

作者信息

Wakefield J C

机构信息

Columbia University School of Social Work.

出版信息

Psychol Rev. 1992 Apr;99(2):232-47. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.99.2.232.

Abstract

The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (3rd ed., rev.; DSM-III-R) operationally defines disorder essentially as "statistically unexpectable distress or disability." This definition is an attempt to operationalize 2 basic principles: that a disorder is harmful and that a disorder is a dysfunction (i.e., an inability of some internal mechanism to perform its natural function). However, the definition fails to capture the idea of "dysfunction" and so fails to validly distinguish disorders from nondisorders, leading to invalidities in many of DSM-III-R's specific diagnostic criteria. These problems with validity are traced to DSM-III-R's strategies for increasing reliability.

摘要

《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》(第3版,修订版;DSM - III - R)从操作层面上将障碍本质上定义为“统计学上意外的痛苦或残疾”。这一定义试图将两条基本原则操作化:一是障碍是有害的,二是障碍是一种功能失调(即某种内部机制无法履行其正常功能)。然而,该定义未能抓住“功能失调”的概念,因此未能有效地将障碍与非障碍区分开来,导致DSM - III - R的许多具体诊断标准无效。这些效度问题可追溯到DSM - III - R提高信度的策略。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验