Wakefield J C
Columbia University School of Social Work.
Psychol Rev. 1992 Apr;99(2):232-47. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.99.2.232.
The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (3rd ed., rev.; DSM-III-R) operationally defines disorder essentially as "statistically unexpectable distress or disability." This definition is an attempt to operationalize 2 basic principles: that a disorder is harmful and that a disorder is a dysfunction (i.e., an inability of some internal mechanism to perform its natural function). However, the definition fails to capture the idea of "dysfunction" and so fails to validly distinguish disorders from nondisorders, leading to invalidities in many of DSM-III-R's specific diagnostic criteria. These problems with validity are traced to DSM-III-R's strategies for increasing reliability.
《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》(第3版,修订版;DSM - III - R)从操作层面上将障碍本质上定义为“统计学上意外的痛苦或残疾”。这一定义试图将两条基本原则操作化:一是障碍是有害的,二是障碍是一种功能失调(即某种内部机制无法履行其正常功能)。然而,该定义未能抓住“功能失调”的概念,因此未能有效地将障碍与非障碍区分开来,导致DSM - III - R的许多具体诊断标准无效。这些效度问题可追溯到DSM - III - R提高信度的策略。