作为健康经济评估中一项修正因素的未经治疗的预后情况。
Prognosis without treatment as a modifier in health economic assessments.
作者信息
Camidge Ross, Walker Andrew, Oliver James J, Nussey Fiona, Maxwell Simon, Jodrell Duncan, Webb David J
机构信息
Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh EH4 2XU.
出版信息
BMJ. 2005 Jun 11;330(7504):1382-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.330.7504.1382.
Abstract
How long someone has to live intuitively seems important in rationing decisions. Incorporating it into economic assessments, as described here, could make decisions fairer
摘要
直观来看，一个人还能活多久在资源分配决策中似乎很重要。如本文所述，将其纳入经济评估可以使决策更加公平。
相似文献
1
Prognosis without treatment as a modifier in health economic assessments.作为健康经济评估中一项修正因素的未经治疗的预后情况。
BMJ. 2005 Jun 11;330(7504):1382-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.330.7504.1382.
2
Review of NICE's recommendations, 1999-2005.英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所（NICE）1999 - 2005年建议回顾。
BMJ. 2006 May 27;332(7552):1266-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.332.7552.1266.
3
Rationing in the fiscal ice age.财政冰河时代的配给制。
Health Econ Policy Law. 2010 Oct;5(4):389-96. doi: 10.1017/S1744133110000095. Epub 2010 Jun 22.
4
The "real-life" death panel, reformed.“现实生活中的”死亡小组，已进行改革。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2011 Jan-Feb;41(1):1 p following 52.
5
Rationing health care. Cost effectiveness should not be the only criterion in deciding on treatment.医疗资源的分配。成本效益不应是决定治疗方案的唯一标准。
BMJ. 1997 Jun 28;314(7098):1901.
6
The DH register of cost-effectiveness studies: content and quality.卫生保健成本效益研究数据库：内容与质量
Health Trends. 1995;27(2):50-6.
7
Rational disinvestment.合理撤资。
QJM. 2010 Oct;103(10):801-7. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcq086. Epub 2010 Jun 8.
8
How NICE may be outflanked.英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所（NICE）可能如何被智取。
BMJ. 2006 May 27;332(7552):1268-71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.332.7552.1268.
9
On being NICE in the UK: guidelines for technology appraisal for the NHS in England and Wales.英国的“国民健康与临床优化研究所”（NICE）：英格兰和威尔士国民医疗服务体系（NHS）技术评估指南
Health Econ. 2002 Apr;11(3):185-91. doi: 10.1002/hec.706.
10
British lessons on health care reform.英国医疗保健改革的经验教训。
N Engl J Med. 2009 Sep 24;361(13):e21. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp0906618. Epub 2009 Sep 9.
引用本文的文献
1
The role of economic evaluation in the decision-making process of family physicians: design and methods of a qualitative embedded multiple-case study.经济评估在家庭医生决策过程中的作用：一项定性嵌入式多案例研究的设计与方法
BMC Fam Pract. 2009 Feb 11;10:15. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-10-15.
2
The impact of prognosis without treatment on doctors' and patients' resource allocation decisions and its relevance to new drug recommendation processes.未经治疗的预后对医生和患者资源分配决策的影响及其与新药推荐流程的相关性。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2008 Feb;65(2):224-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2007.02996.x.
3
Cost-effectiveness analysis of cetuximab/irinotecan vs active/best supportive care for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer patients who have failed previous chemotherapy treatment.西妥昔单抗/伊立替康与积极/最佳支持治疗用于治疗既往化疗失败的转移性结直肠癌患者的成本效益分析。
Br J Cancer. 2007 Jan 29;96(2):206-12. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603561.
4
A middle way for rationing healthcare resources.医疗资源分配的折衷办法。
BMJ. 2005 Jun 11;330(7504):1340-1. doi: 10.1136/bmj.330.7504.1340.
本文引用的文献
1
Is economic evaluation in touch with society's health values?经济评估是否符合社会的健康价值观？
BMJ. 2004 Nov 20;329(7476):1233-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.329.7476.1233.
2
Challenges for the National Institute for Clinical Excellence.英国国家临床优化研究所面临的挑战。
BMJ. 2004 Jul 24;329(7459):227-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.329.7459.227.
3
National Institute for Clinical Excellence and its value judgments.国家临床优化研究所及其价值判断。
BMJ. 2004 Jul 24;329(7459):224-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.329.7459.224.
4
A test of the QALY model when health varies over time.当健康状况随时间变化时对质量调整生命年（QALY）模型的一项测试。
Soc Sci Med. 2003 Nov;57(9):1697-706. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(02)00554-3.
5
Choosing the method to match the perspective: economic assessment and its implications for health-services efficiency.选择与视角相匹配的方法：经济评估及其对卫生服务效率的影响。
Lancet. 2002 May 18;359(9319):1771-4. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08664-6.
6
Equitable rationing of highly specialised health care services for children: a perspective from South Africa.儿童高度专业化医疗服务的公平分配：来自南非的视角
J Med Ethics. 1999 Jun;25(3):224-9. doi: 10.1136/jme.25.3.224.
7
Priority setting in health care: learning from international experience.医疗保健中的优先事项设定：借鉴国际经验。
Health Policy. 1997 Oct;42(1):49-66. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8510(97)00054-7.
8
The rationing debate. Rationing health care by age.配给制辩论。按年龄配给医疗保健服务。
BMJ. 1997 Mar 15;314(7083):820-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7083.820.
9
Cost-effectiveness analysis in a setting of budget constraints--is it equitable?预算约束背景下的成本效益分析——是否公平？
N Engl J Med. 1996 May 2;334(18):1174-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199605023341807.
10
Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of cancer treatment: rational allocation of resources based on decision analysis.癌症治疗的疗效与成本效益：基于决策分析的资源合理分配
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993 Sep 15;85(18):1460-74. doi: 10.1093/jnci/85.18.1460.
Zotero 插件