Suppr超能文献

体外反搏新的分级压力方案可降低充血性心力衰竭患者的死亡率并改善预后:来自心脏医学体外反搏患者注册研究的报告

New graduated pressure regimen for external counterpulsation reduces mortality and improves outcomes in congestive heart failure: a report from the Cardiomedics External Counterpulsation Patient Registry.

作者信息

Vijayaraghavan Krishnaswami, Santora Lawrence, Kahn Joel, Abbott Norman, Torelli Julius, Vardi Gil

机构信息

Scottsdale Cardiovascular Center, 3099 Civic Center Plaza, Scottsdale, AZ 85251, USA.

出版信息

Congest Heart Fail. 2005 May-Jun;11(3):147-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1527-5299.2005.04068.x.

Abstract

External counterpulsation (ECP) has been shown to increase exercise tolerance and reduce angina episodes, Canadian Cardiovascular Society Functional (CCSF) class, anginal medication usage, and hospitalizations in refractive CCSF class III and IV stable angina. However, the high pressures and resulting 1.5:1-2:1 peak diastolic to peak systolic pressure (D/S) ratios shown to be optimal in the treatment of angina can cause excessive preload and adverse effects in congestive heart failure (CHF) patients, particularly those with left ventricular ejection fractions <40%. Data were retrospectively analyzed from the Cardiomedics ECP Registry on 127 New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II-IV CHF patients (79.6% men; average age +/- SD, 68.2+/-15.6 years), with a comorbidity of CCSF class III-IV refractive angina, who were serially treated with 35 hours of ECP (1 h/d, 5 d/wk for 7 weeks) at unconventionally low pressures and D/S ratios under a new graduated pressure regimen. The pressures and D/S ratios were gradually increased in stages over the 7-week ECP regimen. The patients were divided into three groups based on the pressures applied and the resulting average D/S ratios (Low, Mid, and High). In the Low D/S ratio group (average D/S ratio 0.7:1), all-cause mortality in the year following ECP treatment was only 1.85% (one of 54 patients), whereas over the same time period in the Mid D/S ratio group (average D/S ratio 1.08:1), all-cause mortality was 7.69% (three of 39 patients) and in the High D/S ratio group (average D/S ratio 1.32:1), all-cause mortality was 8.82% (three of 34 patients). For the Low, Mid, and High D/S ratio groups, respectively: 1) average left ventricular ejection fractions increased 23.0%, 20.1%, and 17.5%; 2) NYHA class declined 36.6%, 29.6%, and 29.6%; and 3) all-cause hospitalizations, including terminal admissions, were reduced 85.7%, 82.6%, and 57.1% in the year following ECP therapy from the prior year. There were no adverse effects or withdrawals from the ECP therapy and no significant difference in sex-based outcomes. Consequently, ECP applied at low pressures and average D/S ratios of 0.7:1 under the new graduated pressure regimen is safe and effective in the treatment of CHF and produces a significant reduction in mortality, compared with the 8.5% annualized mortality of the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial II (MADIT II) (N=1232) of NYHA class II-III CHF and the 12.2% annual mortality of the Comparison of Medical Therapy, Pacing, and Defibrillation in Heart Failure (COMPANION) study (N=595) of NYHA class III-IV CHF. Lower pressures improve patient comfort and may encourage more CHF patients to seek treatment. The reduction in hospitalizations should significantly reduce the cost of treating CHF.

摘要

体外反搏(ECP)已被证明可提高运动耐量,减少心绞痛发作次数、加拿大心血管学会心功能分级(CCSF)、心绞痛药物使用量,并减少CCSF III级和IV级难治性稳定型心绞痛患者的住院次数。然而,在心绞痛治疗中显示为最佳的高压以及由此产生的1.5:1至2:1的舒张期峰值与收缩期峰值压力(D/S)比值,可能会在充血性心力衰竭(CHF)患者中导致过多的前负荷和不良反应,尤其是左心室射血分数<40%的患者。对Cardiomedics ECP注册中心的127例纽约心脏协会(NYHA)II-IV级CHF患者(79.6%为男性;平均年龄±标准差,68.2±15.6岁)进行回顾性数据分析,这些患者合并CCSF III-IV级难治性心绞痛,在新的分级压力方案下,以非常规的低压和D/S比值接受了35小时的ECP治疗(每天1小时,每周5天,共7周)。在7周的ECP治疗方案中,压力和D/S比值分阶段逐渐增加。根据所施加的压力和由此产生的平均D/S比值,将患者分为三组(低、中、高)。在低D/S比值组(平均D/S比值0.7:1)中,ECP治疗后一年的全因死亡率仅为1.85%(54例患者中的1例),而在同一时期,中D/S比值组(平均D/S比值1.08:1)的全因死亡率为7.69%(39例患者中的3例),高D/S比值组(平均D/S比值1.32:1)的全因死亡率为8.82%(34例患者中的3例)。对于低、中、高D/S比值组,分别为:1)平均左心室射血分数增加23.0%、20.1%和17.5%;2)NYHA分级下降36.6%、29.6%和29.6%;3)在ECP治疗后的一年中,包括末期住院在内的全因住院次数较上一年减少了85.7%、82.6%和57.1%。ECP治疗没有不良反应或中断,基于性别的结果也没有显著差异。因此,在新的分级压力方案下,以低压和平均D/S比值0.7:1进行ECP治疗在CHF治疗中是安全有效的,与NYHA II-III级CHF的多中心自动除颤器植入试验II(MADIT II)(N = 1232)的8.5%年化死亡率以及NYHA III-IV级CHF的心力衰竭医学治疗、起搏和除颤比较(COMPANION)研究(N = 595)的12.2%年死亡率相比,死亡率显著降低。较低的压力提高了患者的舒适度,并可能鼓励更多CHF患者寻求治疗。住院次数的减少应能显著降低CHF的治疗成本。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验