• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

双腿生物电阻抗分析(BIA)对预测摔跤运动员的最低体重是否有效?

Is leg-to-leg BIA valid for predicting minimum weight in wrestlers?

作者信息

Clark R Randall, Bartok Cynthia, Sullivan Jude C, Schoeller Dale A

机构信息

University of Wisconsin Hospital Sports Medicine Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53711, USA.

出版信息

Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005 Jun;37(6):1061-8.

PMID:15947734
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) and several state associations require prediction of minimum weight (MW) for collegiate and high school wrestlers. The rule requires assessment of body composition before the competitive season to minimize unhealthy weight-loss practices. Leg-to-leg bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) has been suggested for use with wrestlers.

PURPOSE

To evaluate leg-to-leg BIA against a four-component (4C) criterion to determine whether leg-to-leg BIA predicted MW within acceptable limits for the sport of wrestling.

METHODS

Criterion MW was calculated by the 4C equation of Lohman (19) using independent measurement of body density (BD) by hydrostatic weighing, bone mineral content (BMC) by dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA), and total body water (TBW) by deuterium dilution. Subjects were 57 wrestlers (mean +/- SD; age = 19.7 +/- 1.3 yr, height = 176.6 +/- 7.3 cm, weight = 77.7 +/- 12.4 kg). Hydration was confirmed by the NCAA guidelines. Accuracy, precision, and systematic bias were examined.

RESULTS

Comparable mean values (72.2 +/- 9.7 vs 72.2 +/- 10.3 kg), a high correlation (r = 0.94), and a regression line similar to the line of identity were found between BIA and 4C. However, large individual differences and systematic bias were seen across the range of MW. BIA predicted MW within 3.5 kg 68% of the time and within 7.0 kg 95% of the time. MW residuals ranged from -10.4 kg to +6.9 kg. When using 2.0 kg as an acceptable cutoff for error, only 40% of the BIA values were within 2.0 kg of the criterion.

CONCLUSION

Large individual variation was seen, and, by definition, the precision was poor when estimating MW for individuals. In practical terms, the prediction error may span multiple weight classes, thus making leg-to-leg BIA unacceptable for prediction of MW in this sample under the conditions of the study.

摘要

背景

美国国家大学生体育协会(NCAA)和几个州协会要求预测大学和高中摔跤运动员的最低体重(MW)。该规则要求在比赛季节前评估身体成分,以尽量减少不健康的减肥行为。有人建议将双腿生物电阻抗分析(BIA)用于摔跤运动员。

目的

根据四成分(4C)标准评估双腿BIA,以确定双腿BIA预测的MW是否在摔跤运动可接受的范围内。

方法

使用Lohman(19)的4C方程计算标准MW,该方程通过静水称重独立测量身体密度(BD)、通过双能X线吸收法(DXA)测量骨矿物质含量(BMC)以及通过氘稀释法测量总体水(TBW)。受试者为57名摔跤运动员(平均±标准差;年龄=19.7±1.3岁,身高=176.6±7.3厘米,体重=77.7±12.4千克)。根据NCAA指南确认水合状态。检查了准确性、精密度和系统偏差。

结果

BIA与4C之间发现了可比的平均值(72.2±9.7对72.2±10.3千克)、高度相关性(r=0.94)以及与恒等线相似的回归线。然而,在MW范围内观察到了较大的个体差异和系统偏差。BIA在68%的时间内预测的MW在3.5千克以内,在95%的时间内预测的MW在7.0千克以内。MW残差范围为-10.4千克至+6.9千克。当使用2.0千克作为可接受的误差临界值时,只有40%的BIA值在标准值的2.0千克以内。

结论

观察到较大的个体差异,并且根据定义,在估计个体的MW时精密度较差。实际上,预测误差可能跨越多个体重级别,因此在本研究条件下,双腿BIA对于该样本中MW的预测是不可接受的。

相似文献

1
Is leg-to-leg BIA valid for predicting minimum weight in wrestlers?双腿生物电阻抗分析(BIA)对预测摔跤运动员的最低体重是否有效?
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005 Jun;37(6):1061-8.
2
Multicomponent cross-validation of minimum weight predictions for college wrestlers.大学摔跤运动员最小体重预测的多组分交叉验证
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003 Feb;35(2):342-7. doi: 10.1249/01.MSS.0000048832.87882.60.
3
Minimum weight prediction methods cross-validated by the four-component model.通过四组分模型交叉验证的最小重量预测方法。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004 Apr;36(4):639-47. doi: 10.1249/01.mss.0000121942.84630.6c.
4
DXA provides a valid minimum weight in wrestlers.双能X线吸收法可得出摔跤运动员有效的最低体重。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007 Nov;39(11):2069-75. doi: 10.1249/mss.0b013e31814fb423.
5
The effect of dehydration on wrestling minimum weight assessment.脱水对摔跤最低体重评估的影响。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004 Jan;36(1):160-7. doi: 10.1249/01.MSS.0000106855.47276.CD.
6
Wrestlers' minimal weight: anthropometry, bioimpedance, and hydrostatic weighing compared.摔跤运动员的最低体重:人体测量学、生物电阻抗与水下称重法的比较
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1991 Feb;23(2):247-53.
7
Cross-validation of bioelectrical impedance analysis for the assessment of body composition in a representative sample of 6- to 13-year-old children.生物电阻抗分析在6至13岁儿童代表性样本中用于评估身体成分的交叉验证。
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2009 May;63(5):619-26. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2008.19. Epub 2008 Feb 20.
8
A comparison of methods to predict minimal weight in high school wrestlers.高中摔跤运动员最小体重预测方法的比较
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1993 Jan;25(1):151-8. doi: 10.1249/00005768-199301000-00021.
9
A comparison of leg-to-leg bioelectrical impedance and skinfolds in assessing body fat in collegiate wrestlers.比较双腿生物电阻抗法与皮褶厚度法在评估大学摔跤运动员体脂中的应用。
J Strength Cond Res. 2001 May;15(2):157-60.
10
Body composition analysis by leg-to-leg bioelectrical impedance and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in non-obese and obese individuals.非肥胖和肥胖个体中通过双腿生物电阻抗和双能X线吸收法进行身体成分分析
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2008 Nov;10(11):1012-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2008.00851.x. Epub 2008 Apr 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Validation of skinfold equations and alternative methods for the determination of fat-free mass in young athletes.青少年运动员皮褶厚度方程及无脂肪体重测定替代方法的验证
Front Sports Act Living. 2023 Aug 11;5:1240252. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2023.1240252. eCollection 2023.