Suppr超能文献

评估精索静脉曲张切除术(包括精索外静脉结扎术)在阴囊疼痛患者中的作用。

Evaluation of the role of varicocelectomy including external spermatic vein ligation in patients with scrotal pain.

作者信息

Karademir Kenan, Senkul Temuçin, Baykal Kadir, Ateş Ferhat, Işeri Cüneyd, Erden Doğan

机构信息

Department of Urology, Haydarpaşa Training Hospital, Gülhane Military Medical Academy, Usküdar, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Int J Urol. 2005 May;12(5):484-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2005.01063.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the present study was to assess and compare pre- and postoperative scrotal pain in patients with varicocele who underwent varicocelectomy with different approaches.

METHODS

The study included 144 consecutive patients with left-sided varicocele who had left scrotal pain for more than 3 months. All patients underwent varicocele ligation using either a subinguinal or inguinal approach with or without external spermatic vein ligation. We asked the patients to complete an 'Assessment Questionnaire for Scrotal Pain' both before and after the surgery.

RESULTS

The surgery was successful in 101 (83.4%) of the 121 patients available for follow up. Seventy-four (61.1%) patients reported the complete resolution of pain while 27 patients (22.3%) reported partial resolution. Symptoms worsened in a single case and pain persisted postoperatively in 19 cases (15.7%). There were no statistically significant differences in the characteristics of the pain and grade of varicocele between postoperative groups. A significant difference was observed in postoperative success between patients who had external spermatic vein ligation and those who did not, regardless of the surgical approach (inguinal or subinguinal). All patients who reported complete or partial resolution of pain stated that they would recommend surgery to relatives with the same problem.

CONCLUSIONS

Varicocelectomy using either inguinal or subinguinal approaches is an effective and reasonable treatment option in this patient group and should include external spermatic vein ligation for a satisfactory outcome.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估和比较采用不同方法进行精索静脉曲张切除术的精索静脉曲张患者术前和术后的阴囊疼痛情况。

方法

该研究纳入了144例连续的左侧精索静脉曲张且左侧阴囊疼痛超过3个月的患者。所有患者均采用腹股沟下或腹股沟入路进行精索静脉曲张结扎术,结扎时可选择结扎或不结扎精索外静脉。我们要求患者在手术前后均完成一份“阴囊疼痛评估问卷”。

结果

在121例可供随访的患者中,101例(83.4%)手术成功。74例(61.1%)患者报告疼痛完全缓解,27例(22.3%)患者报告部分缓解。1例患者症状加重,19例(15.7%)患者术后疼痛持续。术后各组之间在疼痛特征和精索静脉曲张分级方面无统计学显著差异。无论手术入路(腹股沟或腹股沟下)如何,结扎精索外静脉的患者与未结扎者相比,术后成功率存在显著差异。所有报告疼痛完全或部分缓解的患者均表示会向有相同问题的亲属推荐手术。

结论

对于该患者群体,采用腹股沟或腹股沟下入路进行精索静脉曲张切除术是一种有效且合理的治疗选择,为获得满意疗效应包括结扎精索外静脉。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验