Gratz Irwin, Deal Edward, Larijani Ghassem E, Domsky Richard, Goldberg Michael E
Department of Anesthesiology, Cooper Hospital, Camden, NJ 08103, USA.
J Clin Anesth. 2005 Jun;17(4):263-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2004.07.009.
To investigate the efficacy and kinetics of bupivacaine when used for deep cervical plexus block (CPB), using either a single-injection or multiple-injections technique.
Prospective, randomized, double-blind study.
Operating room of a university hospital.
Twenty-four adult patients (16 men, 8 women) scheduled for carotid endarterectomy.
Patients were randomly assigned to receive CPB either by a single injection or after 3 injections. Patients in the multiple-injections group received a total dose of 15 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine (5 mL each deposited at C2, C3, and C4 over 2 minutes). Patients in the single-injection group received a single 15-mL injection of 0.5% bupivacaine. After the deep CPB, a superficial CPB was performed with 20 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine in all patients.
An anesthesiologist and a surgeon graded the success of the block. Arterial plasma concentrations of bupivacaine were measured using liquid chromatography-mass spectroscopy.
No significant differences were seen between the 2 groups with respect to the mean peak concentration of bupivacaine (single injection 2314 +/- 1385 ng/mL vs multiple injections 2255 +/- 1105 ng/mL) or time to reach the maximal concentration (time to maximum concentration [single injection 12.1 +/- 7.2 minutes vs multiple injections 12.5 +/- 3.9 minutes]). Furthermore, there were no significant differences in mean block scores between the single-injection and the multiple-injections groups, evaluated either by the anesthesiologists or the surgeon.
The results of this study showed that the absorption of bupivacaine is independent of the number of injections after CPB, and that anesthesia for carotid endarterectomy may be accomplished successfully using either technique.
探讨布比卡因用于颈深丛阻滞(CPB)时采用单次注射或多次注射技术的疗效和动力学。
前瞻性、随机、双盲研究。
大学医院手术室。
24例计划行颈动脉内膜切除术的成年患者(16例男性,8例女性)。
患者随机分为单次注射或3次注射后接受CPB。多次注射组患者接受总量为15 mL的0.5%布比卡因(每2分钟在C2、C3和C4各注射5 mL)。单次注射组患者接受一次15 mL的0.5%布比卡因注射。在深CPB后,所有患者均用20 mL的0.5%布比卡因进行浅CPB。
由一名麻醉医生和一名外科医生对阻滞的成功情况进行评分。采用液相色谱 - 质谱法测量布比卡因的动脉血浆浓度。
两组在布比卡因的平均峰值浓度(单次注射2314±1385 ng/mL vs多次注射2255±1105 ng/mL)或达到最大浓度的时间(达峰时间[单次注射12.1±7.2分钟vs多次注射12.5±3.9分钟])方面无显著差异。此外,无论是麻醉医生还是外科医生评估,单次注射组和多次注射组之间的平均阻滞评分均无显著差异。
本研究结果表明,CPB后布比卡因的吸收与注射次数无关,两种技术均可成功完成颈动脉内膜切除术的麻醉。