Suppr超能文献

高剂量序贯化疗联合自体移植与剂量密集化疗MegaCEOP作为预后不良弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤一线治疗的比较:一项“意大利淋巴瘤协作组”随机试验

High dose sequential chemotherapy with autologous transplantation versus dose-dense chemotherapy MegaCEOP as first line treatment in poor-prognosis diffuse large cell lymphoma: an "Intergruppo Italiano Linfomi" randomized trial.

作者信息

Vitolo Umberto, Liberati Anna Marina, Cabras Maria Giuseppina, Federico Massimo, Angelucci Emanuele, Baldini Luca, Boccomini Carola, Brugiatelli Maura, Calvi Roberta, Ciccone Giovannino, Genua Angelo, Deliliers Giorgio Lambertenghi, Levis Alessandro, Parvis Guido, Pavone Enzo, Salvi Flavia, Sborgia Marco, Gallo Eugenio

机构信息

Ematologia, Azienda Ospedaliera S. Giovanni Battista, Corso Bramante 88, 10126 Turin, Italy.

出版信息

Haematologica. 2005 Jun;90(6):793-801.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Poor prognosis diffuse large cell lymphoma (DLCL) responds poorly to standard chemotherapy. Randomized studies comparing high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) against standard chemotherapy have produced conflicting results. Dose-dense chemotherapy with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) support seems to hold promise. The purpose of this multicenter, randomized trial was to compare failure-free and overall survival in patients with poor prognosis DLCL treated with high-dose sequential (HDS) chemotherapy followed by ASCT or an outpatient dose-dense chemotherapy regimen (MegaCEOP).

DESIGN AND METHODS

Between 1996 and 2001, 130 DLCL patients, aged < or = 60 years, with intermediate-high or high-risk disease, according to the International Prognostic Index score, and/or bone marrow involvement were enrolled. Sixty were randomized to HDS chemotherapy plus high-dose mitoxantrone and melphalan with ASCT (arm A) and 66 to the MegaCEOP regimen (6-8 courses of an escalated dose of cyclophosphamide and epirubicin plus vincristine and prednisone with G-CSF every 2-weeks) (arm B); 4 patients were considered ineligible.

RESULTS

The complete remission rate was 59% in arm A and 70% in arm B (p = 0.18). After a median follow-up of 78 months, the 6-year failure-free survival was 45% in arm A and 48% in arm B (hazard ratio = 1.15, 95% confidence intervals = 0.72-1.84, p = 0.56). The 5-year overall survival was 49% in arm A and 63% in arm B (hazard ratio = 1.67, 95% confidence interval = 0.98-2.85, p = 0.06). Two cases of secondary acute myeloid leukemia were observed after treatment in group A.

INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS

HDS and ASCT as initial therapy for patients with poor-prognosis DLCL does not provide a benefit over that of outpatient dose-dense MegaCEOP chemotherapy.

摘要

背景与目的

预后较差的弥漫性大细胞淋巴瘤(DLCL)对标准化疗反应不佳。比较大剂量化疗联合自体干细胞移植(ASCT)与标准化疗的随机研究结果相互矛盾。粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)支持下的剂量密集化疗似乎颇具前景。这项多中心随机试验的目的是比较接受大剂量序贯(HDS)化疗后行ASCT或门诊剂量密集化疗方案(MegaCEOP)治疗的预后较差的DLCL患者的无失败生存期和总生存期。

设计与方法

1996年至2001年间,纳入了130例年龄小于或等于60岁、根据国际预后指数评分属于中高危或高危疾病和/或有骨髓受累的DLCL患者。60例被随机分配至HDS化疗联合大剂量米托蒽醌和美法仑并进行ASCT组(A组),66例被分配至MegaCEOP方案组(每2周给予6 - 8个疗程递增剂量的环磷酰胺、表柔比星加长春新碱和泼尼松并联合G-CSF)(B组);4例患者被认为不符合条件。

结果

A组的完全缓解率为59%,B组为70%(p = 0.18)。中位随访78个月后,A组的6年无失败生存率为45%,B组为48%(风险比 = 1.15,95%置信区间 = 0.72 - 1.84,p = 0.56)。A组的5年总生存率为49%,B组为63%(风险比 = 1.67,95%置信区间 = 0.98 - 2.85,p = 0.06)。A组治疗后观察到2例继发性急性髓系白血病病例。

解读与结论

对于预后较差的DLCL患者,HDS和ASCT作为初始治疗并不比门诊剂量密集MegaCEOP化疗更具优势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验