• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

强化大剂量化疗联合粒细胞集落刺激因子及自体干细胞移植支持作为高危弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤的一线治疗方案

Intensified and high-dose chemotherapy with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and autologous stem-cell transplantation support as first-line therapy in high-risk diffuse large-cell lymphoma.

作者信息

Vitolo U, Cortellazzo S, Liberati A M, Freilone R, Falda M, Bertini M, Botto B, Cinieri S, Levis A, Locatelli F, Lovisone E, Marmont F, Pizzuti M, Rossi A, Viero P, Barbui T, Grignani F, Resegotti L

机构信息

Divisione di Ematologia Azienda Ospedaliera S. Giovanni Battista, Torino, Italy.

出版信息

J Clin Oncol. 1997 Feb;15(2):491-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1997.15.2.491.

DOI:10.1200/JCO.1997.15.2.491
PMID:9053470
Abstract

PURPOSE

In our previous study with MACOPB, we identified a high-risk group of patients with a poor 3-year survival rate of 29%. These patients were defined as having at diagnosis advanced-stage disease with high tumor burden (TB) and elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level or bone marrow (BM) involvement. A novel therapeutic scheme was investigated to improve the outcome of these patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifty patients with high-risk diffuse large-cell lymphoma (DLCL) were enrolled. The therapeutic scheme includes three phases: induction with 8 weeks of MACOPB; intensification with a 3-day course of mitoxantrone 8 mg/m2 plus high-dose cytarabine (HDARA-C) 2 g/m2 every 12 hours plus dexamethasone 4 mg/m2 every 12 hours (MAD protocol) and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) 5 microg/kg on days 4 to 17 to harvest peripheral-blood progenitor cells (PBPC); consolidation with carmustine (BCNU), etoposide, ARA-C, and melphalan (BEAM) regimen; plus autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) with PBPC, marrow, or both.

RESULTS

Thirty-six patients (72%) achieved a complete response (CR), 11 (22%) showed no response (NR), and three (6%) died of toxicity. Among the 22 PRs or NRs after the induction phase, 56% of patients achieved a CR with subsequent intensified therapy. With a median follow-up duration of 32 months, the overall survival and failure-free survival rates were 56% and 50%, respectively. The disease-free survival rate is 69% at 32 months. Leukapheresis after MAD and G-CSF yielded a median of 32 x 10(6)/kg CD34+ cells and 80 x 10(4)/kg granulocyte-macrophage colony-forming units (CFU-GM). Thirty-nine patients were autografted and 11 did not undergo ASCT: six because of disease progression, four due to toxicity, and one because of patient refusal. The median times to achieve engrafment were 11 days (range, 7 to 19) to a neutrophil count greater than 0.5 x 10(9)/L and 12 days (range, 8 to 60) to a platelet count greater than 50 x 10(9)/L.

CONCLUSION

This sequential scheme with intensified and high-dose chemotherapy with ASCT is feasible with moderate toxicity and may improve the outcome in high-risk DLCL.

摘要

目的

在我们之前关于MACOPB方案的研究中,我们确定了一组高危患者,其3年生存率较低,为29%。这些患者被定义为在诊断时患有晚期疾病,肿瘤负荷(TB)高、乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)水平升高或有骨髓(BM)受累。我们研究了一种新的治疗方案以改善这些患者的治疗结果。

患者与方法

纳入50例高危弥漫性大细胞淋巴瘤(DLCL)患者。治疗方案包括三个阶段:8周的MACOPB诱导治疗;用米托蒽醌8 mg/m²加高三尖杉酯碱(HDARA-C)2 g/m²每12小时一次加地塞米松4 mg/m²每12小时一次(MAD方案)和粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)5 μg/kg在第4至17天进行强化治疗以采集外周血祖细胞(PBPC);用卡莫司汀(BCNU)、依托泊苷、阿糖胞苷和马法兰(BEAM)方案进行巩固治疗;加用PBPC、骨髓或两者的自体干细胞移植(ASCT)。

结果

36例患者(72%)达到完全缓解(CR),11例(22%)无反应(NR),3例(6%)死于毒性反应。在诱导期后的22例部分缓解(PR)或NR患者中,56%的患者在随后的强化治疗后达到CR。中位随访时间为32个月,总生存率和无失败生存率分别为56%和50%。32个月时无病生存率为69%。MAD方案和G-CSF治疗后白细胞单采术获得的CD34⁺细胞中位数为32×10⁶/kg,粒细胞-巨噬细胞集落形成单位(CFU-GM)为80×10⁴/kg。39例患者接受了自体移植,11例未进行ASCT:6例因疾病进展,4例因毒性反应,1例因患者拒绝。达到中性粒细胞计数大于0.5×10⁹/L的中位植入时间为11天(范围7至19天),血小板计数大于50×10⁹/L的中位植入时间为12天(范围8至60天)。

结论

这种序贯方案联合强化和大剂量化疗及ASCT是可行的,毒性适中,可能改善高危DLCL患者的治疗结果。

相似文献

1
Intensified and high-dose chemotherapy with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and autologous stem-cell transplantation support as first-line therapy in high-risk diffuse large-cell lymphoma.强化大剂量化疗联合粒细胞集落刺激因子及自体干细胞移植支持作为高危弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤的一线治疗方案
J Clin Oncol. 1997 Feb;15(2):491-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1997.15.2.491.
2
Rituximab-dose-dense chemotherapy with or without high-dose chemotherapy plus autologous stem-cell transplantation in high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLCL04): final results of a multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 3 study.利妥昔单抗密集化疗联合或不联合大剂量化疗和自体干细胞移植治疗高危弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤(DLCL04):一项多中心、开放标签、随机、对照、3 期研究的最终结果。
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Aug;18(8):1076-1088. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30444-8. Epub 2017 Jun 28.
3
Autologous progenitor cell transplantation: prior exposure to stem cell-toxic drugs determines yield and engraftment of peripheral blood progenitor cell but not of bone marrow grafts.自体祖细胞移植:先前接触干细胞毒性药物决定外周血祖细胞的产量和植入,但不影响骨髓移植物。
Blood. 1995 Nov 15;86(10):3970-8.
4
High-dose therapy with peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation in low-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.低级别非霍奇金淋巴瘤的高剂量疗法与外周血祖细胞移植
Bone Marrow Transplant. 1996 Feb;17(2):149-55.
5
Toxicity of high-dose sequential chemotherapy and purged autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation precludes its use in refractory/recurrent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.大剂量序贯化疗及净化自体造血细胞移植的毒性使其无法用于难治性/复发性非霍奇金淋巴瘤。
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2000;6(5A):555-62. doi: 10.1016/s1083-8791(00)70065-6.
6
Intensive sequential chemotherapy with repeated blood stem-cell support for untreated poor-prognosis non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.采用重复血液干细胞支持的强化序贯化疗治疗初治预后不良的非霍奇金淋巴瘤。
J Clin Oncol. 1997 May;15(5):1722-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1997.15.5.1722.
7
High dose sequential chemotherapy with autologous transplantation versus dose-dense chemotherapy MegaCEOP as first line treatment in poor-prognosis diffuse large cell lymphoma: an "Intergruppo Italiano Linfomi" randomized trial.高剂量序贯化疗联合自体移植与剂量密集化疗MegaCEOP作为预后不良弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤一线治疗的比较:一项“意大利淋巴瘤协作组”随机试验
Haematologica. 2005 Jun;90(6):793-801.
8
Effect of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in patients with diffuse large cell lymphoma treated with intensive chemotherapy.粒细胞集落刺激因子在接受强化化疗的弥漫性大细胞淋巴瘤患者中的作用。
Leuk Lymphoma. 1994 Sep;15(1-2):153-7. doi: 10.3109/10428199409051691.
9
Randomized comparison of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor versus granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor plus intensive chemotherapy for peripheral blood stem cell mobilization and autologous transplantation in multiple myeloma.粒细胞集落刺激因子与粒细胞巨噬细胞集落刺激因子联合强化化疗用于多发性骨髓瘤外周血干细胞动员和自体移植的随机对照研究
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2004 Jun;10(6):395-404. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2004.02.001.
10
Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor following peripheral-blood progenitor-cell transplant in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者外周血祖细胞移植后使用粒细胞集落刺激因子
J Clin Oncol. 1995 Apr;13(4):935-41. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1995.13.4.935.

引用本文的文献

1
Dose-dense and high-dose chemotherapy plus rituximab with autologous stem cell transplantation for primary treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma with a poor prognosis: a phase II multicenter study.剂量密集和高剂量化疗联合利妥昔单抗及自体干细胞移植用于初治预后不良的弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤:一项II期多中心研究
Haematologica. 2009 Sep;94(9):1250-8. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2009.007005. Epub 2009 Jul 7.
2
High-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation in the first line treatment of aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) in adults.大剂量化疗联合自体干细胞移植用于成人侵袭性非霍奇金淋巴瘤(NHL)的一线治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jan 23;2008(1):CD004024. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004024.pub2.
3
Outcome for young high-risk aggressive B-cell lymphoma patients treated with CHOEP-14 and rituximab (R-CHOEP-14).
采用CHOEP-14方案联合利妥昔单抗(R-CHOEP-14)治疗的年轻高危侵袭性B细胞淋巴瘤患者的结局
Med Oncol. 2006;23(2):283-93. doi: 10.1385/MO:23:2:283.
4
Upfront transplantation for poor-risk aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma and Hodgkin's disease: who benefits?对于预后不良的侵袭性非霍奇金淋巴瘤和霍奇金病进行早期移植:谁能从中获益?
Curr Oncol Rep. 2001 May;3(3):271-8. doi: 10.1007/s11912-001-0061-0.
5
Treatment of aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in adults--are we doing any better?成人侵袭性非霍奇金淋巴瘤的治疗——我们是否有所进步?
Med Oncol. 1996 Dec;13(4):185-94. doi: 10.1007/BF02990930.