Huemer Georg M, Meirer Romed, Gurunluoglu Raffi, Kamelger Florian S, Dunst Karin M, Wanner Siegmund, Piza-Katzer Hildegunde
Clinical Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Medical University Innsbruck, Austria.
Wound Repair Regen. 2005 May-Jun;13(3):262-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1067-1927.2005.130308.x.
The induction of neoangiogenesis by exogenous growth factors in failing skin flaps has recently yielded promising results. Gene transfer with virus vectors has been introduced as a highly capable route of administration for growth factors, such as vascular endothelial growth factor or fibroblast growth factor. Extracorporal shock waves (ESW) deliver energy by means of high amplitudes of sound to the target tissue and have been shown to induce angiogenesis. We compared the effectiveness of gene therapy with adenovirus-mediated transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) and ESW therapy to treat ischemically challenged epigastric skin flaps in a rat model. Thirty male Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into three groups of 10 each with an 8 x 8 cm epigastric skin flap. Rats received either subdermal injections of adenovirus (Ad) encoding TGF-beta (10(8) pfu) or ESW treatment with 750 impulses at 0.15 mJ/mm2. The third group received no treatment and served as a control group. Flap viability was evaluated after 7 days and digital images of the epigastric flaps were taken and areas of necrotic zones relative to total flap surface area calculated. Histologic evaluation and increased angiogenesis were confirmed by CD31 immunohistochemistry. Overall, there was a significant increase in mean percent surviving area in the Ad-TGF-beta group and the ESW group compared to the control group (ESW group: 97.7 +/- 1.8% vs. Ad-TGF-beta: 90.3 +/- 4.0% and control group: 82.6 +/- 4.3%; p < 0.05). Furthermore, in the ESW group mean percent surviving areas were significantly larger than in the Ad-TGF-beta group (ESW group: 97.7 +/- 1.8% vs. Ad-TGF-beta: 90.3 +/- 4.0%; p < 0.05). Flap vascularization was increased by Ad-TGF-beta and ESW with numerous vessels, however, there was no significant difference between the two treatment groups. We conclude that treatment with ESW enhances epigastric skin flap survival significantly more than Ad-TGF-beta treatment and thus represents a modality that is feasible, cost-effective, and less invasive compared to gene therapy with growth factors to improve blood supply to ischemic tissue.
外源性生长因子诱导失活皮瓣新生血管生成最近已取得了令人鼓舞的成果。病毒载体介导的基因转移已被引入,作为血管内皮生长因子或成纤维细胞生长因子等生长因子的一种高效给药途径。体外冲击波(ESW)通过高强度声音将能量传递至靶组织,并已被证明可诱导血管生成。我们在大鼠模型中比较了腺病毒介导的转化生长因子-β(TGF-β)基因治疗和ESW治疗对缺血性上腹部皮瓣的疗效。30只雄性Sprague-Dawley大鼠被分为三组,每组10只,制作8×8cm的上腹部皮瓣。大鼠分别接受皮下注射编码TGF-β的腺病毒(Ad)(10⁸ pfu)或750次、能量为0.15 mJ/mm²的ESW治疗。第三组不接受治疗,作为对照组。7天后评估皮瓣活力,拍摄上腹部皮瓣的数字图像,并计算坏死区面积相对于皮瓣总面积的比例。通过CD31免疫组织化学证实组织学评估及血管生成增加。总体而言,与对照组相比,Ad-TGF-β组和ESW组的平均存活面积百分比显著增加(ESW组:97.7±1.8%,Ad-TGF-β组:90.3±4.0%,对照组:82.6±4.3%;p<0.05)。此外,ESW组的平均存活面积百分比显著大于Ad-TGF-β组(ESW组:97.7±1.8%,Ad-TGF-β组:90.3±4.0%;p<0.05)。Ad-TGF-β和ESW均增加了皮瓣血管化,有大量血管,但两组治疗之间无显著差异。我们得出结论,与Ad-TGF-β治疗相比,ESW治疗能显著提高上腹部皮瓣存活率,因此与生长因子基因治疗相比,它是一种可行、经济有效且侵入性较小的改善缺血组织血供的方式。