Jensen Mark P, Abresch Richard T, Carter Gregory T, McDonald Craig M
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Box 356490, Seattle, WA 98195-6490, USA.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005 Jun;86(6):1155-63. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.11.028.
To examine the nature and scope of pain in persons with neuromuscular disorder (NMD).
Survey study.
University-based rehabilitation research programs.
Adults with NMD (N=193).
Not applicable.
Pain presence or absence, pain severity, pain quality (Neuropathic Pain Scale), pain interference (Brief Pain Inventory), pain site, quality of life (Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey [SF-36]), and pain treatment.
Seventy-three percent of the sample reported pain, with 27% of these reporting that this pain was severe (> or =7 on a 0-10 scale), on average. "Deep," "tiring," "sharp," and "dull" were the words used most frequently to describe NMD pain. Patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and myotonic muscular dystrophies reported the greatest pain interference, and patients with Charcot-Marie-Tooth the least, among all NMD diagnoses. The most frequent pain site, overall, was back (49%), followed by leg (47%), shoulder (43%), neck (40%), buttock and hip(s) (37%), feet (36%), arm(s) (36%), and hand(s) (35%). The study participants reported significantly greater dysfunction than subjects in the SF-36 normative sample (persons without health problems) on a number of the SF-36 scales. However, we found no significant differences between the study participants and the US norms on the SF-36 role-emotional or mental health scales. A number of pain treatments were used by the study sample, but no treatment appeared to be effective for all participants, and some of the treatments reported as most effective (eg, chiropractic care) were used by very few participants.
Pain is a common problem among patients with NMDs. There are many similarities, but also some important differences, between NMD diagnostic groups on the nature and scope of pain and its impact. More research is needed to identify and test effective treatments for NMD-related pain.
研究神经肌肉疾病(NMD)患者疼痛的性质和范围。
调查研究。
基于大学的康复研究项目。
成年NMD患者(N = 193)。
不适用。
疼痛的有无、疼痛严重程度、疼痛性质(神经病理性疼痛量表)、疼痛干扰(简明疼痛问卷)、疼痛部位、生活质量(医学结局研究36项简短健康调查[SF - 36])以及疼痛治疗情况。
73%的样本报告有疼痛,其中平均27%的人报告疼痛严重(0 - 10分制中≥7分)。“深部的”“使人疲惫的”“尖锐的”和“钝痛的”是最常用来描述NMD疼痛的词汇。在所有NMD诊断类型中,肌萎缩侧索硬化症和强直性肌营养不良患者报告的疼痛干扰最大,而夏科 - 马里 - 图斯病患者报告的疼痛干扰最小。总体而言,最常出现疼痛的部位是背部(49%),其次是腿部(47%)、肩部(43%)、颈部(40%)、臀部(37%)、足部(36%)、手臂(36%)和手部(35%)。研究参与者在SF - 36的多个量表上报告的功能障碍明显高于SF - 36常模样本(无健康问题的人)。然而,我们发现研究参与者与美国SF - 36角色情感或心理健康量表的常模之间没有显著差异。研究样本使用了多种疼痛治疗方法,但似乎没有一种治疗方法对所有参与者都有效,而且一些报告为最有效的治疗方法(如脊椎按摩治疗)只有极少数参与者使用。
疼痛是NMD患者中的常见问题。在疼痛的性质和范围及其影响方面,NMD诊断组之间有许多相似之处,但也存在一些重要差异。需要更多研究来确定和测试针对NMD相关疼痛的有效治疗方法。