Wu J, Zhu S M, He H L, Weng X C, Huang S Q, Chen Y Z
Department of Anesthesiology, 1st Affiliated Hospital of Medical College, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2005 Jul;49(6):804-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2005.00671.x.
The aim of this study was to investigate the changes in plasma concentrations of propofol in three phases (the paleohepatic, anhepatic, and neohepatic phases) during orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) using target-controlled infusion (TCI).
Ten patients undergoing OLT without venovenous bypass were studied (age 29-53 years, weight 56-79 kg). After intubation, a non-hypnotic target concentration of propofol 0.5 microg ml(-1) using a Diprifusor pump (Zeneca Pharmaceuticals, Macclesfield, UK) was administered as a supplement anesthesia throughout the procedure. Plasma samples were obtained in each phase for propofol assay, respectively. Performance parameters for the Diprifusor system in each phase, the percentage median performance error (MDPE), the percentage median absolute performance error (MDAPE), and the percentage median absolute constancy error (MDACE) were evaluated.
In all patients, measured plasma propofol concentrations were several times higher than Diprifusor values in each phase during the procedure. In nine patients, propofol concentrations in the anhepatic phase were higher than those in the paleohepatic or neohepatic phase (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences between the paleohepatic and neohepatic phases. Interindividual variation of the plasma propofol concentrations was significant (P < 0.05). Percentage median performance error of Diprifusor in each phase, as well as MDAPE, was large (>300%) and was significantly higher in the anhepatic phase (P < 0.01), whereas MDACE was relatively small and there was no significant difference between phases.
Models used by Diprifusor are not suitable for liver transplantation patients. A further study should be performed in order to determine all pharmacokinetic parameters of propofol in these patients.
本研究旨在探讨在原位肝移植(OLT)过程中,使用靶控输注(TCI)时丙泊酚血浆浓度在三个阶段(无肝前期、无肝期和新肝期)的变化。
对10例行OLT且未进行静脉-静脉转流的患者进行研究(年龄29 - 53岁,体重56 - 79 kg)。插管后,使用得普利麻泵(英国麦克尔斯菲尔德的捷利康制药公司)给予非催眠剂量的丙泊酚靶浓度0.5μg/ml作为整个手术过程中的辅助麻醉。在每个阶段分别采集血浆样本用于丙泊酚测定。评估得普利麻系统在每个阶段的性能参数,即中位性能误差百分比(MDPE)、中位绝对性能误差百分比(MDAPE)和中位绝对恒定误差百分比(MDACE)。
在所有患者中,术中各阶段测得的血浆丙泊酚浓度均比得普利麻系统显示的值高几倍。9例患者无肝期的丙泊酚浓度高于无肝前期或新肝期(P < 0.05)。无肝前期和新肝期之间无显著差异。血浆丙泊酚浓度的个体间差异显著(P < 0.05)。得普利麻系统在每个阶段的中位性能误差百分比以及MDAPE均较大(>300%),且在无肝期显著更高(P < 0.01),而MDACE相对较小,各阶段之间无显著差异。
得普利麻系统使用的模型不适用于肝移植患者。应进一步开展研究以确定这些患者中丙泊酚的所有药代动力学参数。