Suppr超能文献

CT图像上肺结节的自动检测:层厚和重建间隔的影响——初步结果

Automated detection of pulmonary nodules on CT images: effect of section thickness and reconstruction interval--initial results.

作者信息

Kim Jin-Sung, Kim Jin-Hwan, Cho Gyuseung, Bae Kyongtae T

机构信息

Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, 510 S Kingshighway Blvd, St Louis, MO 63110, USA.

出版信息

Radiology. 2005 Jul;236(1):295-9. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2361041288. Epub 2005 Jun 13.

Abstract

Institutional review board approval was obtained. Informed patient consent was not required. Study was compliant with HIPAA. Performance of an automated pulmonary nodule detection program was evaluated on multi-detector row CT images that were acquired once but reconstructed retrospectively at different section thicknesses and reconstruction intervals. From raw CT data in 10 patients with pulmonary nodules, three sets of CT images were reconstructed separately in each patient by selecting two section thickness and reconstruction combinations, respectively: thin group, 1 and 1 mm; overlap group, 5 and 1 mm; and thick group, 5 and 5 mm. Nodules 3 mm in diameter and larger were detected in each group (thin group, 126 nodules; overlap group, 121 nodules; and thick group, 114 nodules) by means of consensus of two radiologists. Findings were used as the reference standard for evaluation of the computer-aided detection (CAD) program. Sensitivity and number of false-positive findings per patient by CAD were: thin group, 95.2% (120 of 126 nodules) and 5.4 findings; overlap group, 94.2% (114 of 121 nodules) and 9.7 findings; and thick group, 88.6% (101 of 114 nodules) and 23.6 findings, indicating that nodule detection degraded with increase in section thickness but improved substantially with a small reconstruction interval.

摘要

本研究获得了机构审查委员会的批准。无需患者签署知情同意书。该研究符合《健康保险流通与责任法案》(HIPAA)。在多排探测器CT图像上评估了自动肺结节检测程序的性能,这些图像是一次性采集的,但以不同的层厚和重建间隔进行回顾性重建。从10例肺结节患者的原始CT数据中,分别通过选择两种层厚和重建组合,在每位患者中单独重建三组CT图像:薄层组,层厚1mm和1mm;重叠组,层厚5mm和1mm;厚层组,层厚5mm和5mm。由两名放射科医生达成共识,在每组中检测出直径3mm及以上的结节(薄层组126个结节;重叠组121个结节;厚层组114个结节)。这些结果用作评估计算机辅助检测(CAD)程序的参考标准。CAD的敏感度和每位患者的假阳性发现数分别为:薄层组,95.2%(126个结节中的120个)和5.4个发现;重叠组,94.2%(121个结节中的114个)和9.7个发现;厚层组,88.6%(114个结节中的101个)和23.6个发现,表明结节检测随着层厚增加而降低,但随着重建间隔减小而显著改善。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验