Schauer C S, Bohnert D W, Ganskopp D C, Richards C J, Falck S J
Eastern Oregon Agricultural Research Center, Oregon State University, Burns, 97720, USA.
J Anim Sci. 2005 Jul;83(7):1715-25. doi: 10.2527/2005.8371715x.
The objectives of this research were to determine the influence of protein supplementation frequency on cow performance, grazing time, distance traveled, maximum distance from water, cow distribution, DMI, DM digestibility, harvest efficiency, percentage of supplementation events frequented, and CV for supplement intake for cows grazing low-quality forage. One hundred twenty pregnant (60 +/- 45 d) Angus x Hereford cows (467 +/- 4 kg BW) were used in a 3 x 3 Latin square design for one 84-d period in each of three consecutive years. Cows were stratified by age, BCS, and BW and assigned randomly to one of three 810-ha pastures. Treatments included an unsupplemented control (CON) and supplementation every day (D; 0.91 kg, DM basis) or once every 6 d (6D; 5.46 kg, DM basis) with cottonseed meal (CSM; 43% CP, DM basis). Four cows from each treatment (each year) were fitted with global positioning system collars to estimate grazing time, distance traveled, maximum distance from water, cow distribution, and percentage of supplementation events frequented. Collared cows were dosed with intraruminal n-alkane controlled-release devices on d 28 for estimation of DMI, DM digestibility, and harvest efficiency. Additionally, Cr2O3 was incorporated into CSM on d 36 at 3% of DM for use as a digesta flow marker to estimate the CV for supplement intake. Cow BW and BCS change were greater (P < or = 0.03) for supplemented treatments compared with CON. No BW or BCS differences (P > or = 0.14) were noted between D and 6D. Grazing time was greater (P = 0.04) for CON compared with supplemented treatments, with no difference (P = 0.26) due to supplementation frequency. Distance traveled, maximum distance from water, cow distribution, DMI, DM digestibility, and harvest efficiency were not affected (P > or = 0.16) by protein supplementation or supplementation frequency. The percentage of supplementation events frequented and the CV for supplement intake were not affected (P > or = 0.58) by supplementation frequency. Results suggest that providing protein daily or once every 6 d to cows grazing low-quality forage increases BW and BCS gain, while decreasing grazing time. Additionally, protein supplementation and supplementation frequency may have little to no effect on cow distribution, DMI, and harvest efficiency in the northern Great Basin.
本研究的目的是确定蛋白质补充频率对放牧低质量牧草的奶牛生产性能、放牧时间、行走距离、距水源最大距离、奶牛分布、干物质采食量(DMI)、干物质消化率、收获效率、补充事件光顾百分比以及补充采食量变异系数(CV)的影响。120头怀孕(60±45天)的安格斯×赫里福德奶牛(体重467±4千克),在连续三年中的每一年,采用3×3拉丁方设计,进行为期84天的试验。奶牛按年龄、体况评分(BCS)和体重分层,随机分配到三个810公顷牧场中的一个。处理包括不补充的对照组(CON),以及每天补充(D组;0.91千克,以干物质计)或每6天补充一次(6D组;5.46千克,以干物质计)棉籽粕(CSM;粗蛋白含量43%,以干物质计)。每个处理(每年)选取4头奶牛佩戴全球定位系统项圈,以估计放牧时间、行走距离、距水源最大距离、奶牛分布以及补充事件光顾百分比。在第28天给佩戴项圈的奶牛安装瘤胃内正构烷烃控释装置,以估计DMI、干物质消化率和收获效率。此外,在第36天,以干物质的3%将三氧化二铬掺入CSM中,用作消化物流动标记物,以估计补充采食量的CV。与CON组相比,补充处理组的奶牛体重和BCS变化更大(P≤0.03)。D组和6D组之间未发现体重或BCS差异(P≥0.14)。与补充处理组相比,CON组的放牧时间更长(P = 0.04),补充频率对放牧时间无影响(P = 0.26)。蛋白质补充或补充频率对行走距离、距水源最大距离、奶牛分布、DMI、干物质消化率和收获效率没有影响(P≥0.16)。补充频率对补充事件光顾百分比和补充采食量的CV没有影响(P≥0.58)。结果表明,给放牧低质量牧草的奶牛每天或每6天补充一次蛋白质,可增加体重和BCS增益,同时减少放牧时间。此外,在大盆地北部,蛋白质补充和补充频率对奶牛分布、DMI和收获效率可能几乎没有影响。