Savitz David A, Dole Nancy, Kaczor Diane, Herring Amy H, Siega-Riz Anna Maria, Kaufman Jay, Thorp John M
Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2005 Jul;19(4):315-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2005.00649.x.
Studies of pregnancy outcome are generally based either on geographically defined populations, often from birth records, or on clinic or hospital populations. We compared women recruited into a clinic-based study, the Pregnancy, Infection, and Nutrition (PIN) Study, with women who resided in the geographical area of the study (Alamance, Orange, and Wake Counties in North Carolina) and gave birth over the corresponding time period (1996-2000). Clinic participants were more likely to be Black, younger, have lower education, be unmarried, have a more frequent history of adverse pregnancy outcome, obtain prenatal care later, and smoke more cigarettes. Despite that profile, the proportion of clinic participants delivering preterm was somewhat lower than among area women overall (10.8% vs. 11.3%). Black/White risk ratios for preterm birth were markedly different for area (1.6) vs. clinic women (1.1), whereas other predictors were similar. Patterns may differ across groups for many reasons, including self-selection of clinics and varying clinical practices.
妊娠结局的研究通常基于地理区域界定的人群(通常来自出生记录),或者基于诊所或医院的人群。我们将纳入一项基于诊所的研究(妊娠、感染与营养[PIN]研究)的女性与居住在研究地理区域(北卡罗来纳州的阿拉曼斯县、奥兰治县和韦克县)且在相应时间段(1996 - 2000年)分娩的女性进行了比较。诊所参与者更可能是黑人、更年轻、受教育程度更低、未婚、有更频繁的不良妊娠结局史、更晚获得产前护理且吸烟更多。尽管有这些特征,但诊所参与者早产的比例略低于整个地区的女性(10.8%对11.3%)。地区女性(1.6)与诊所女性(1.1)的早产黑/白风险比明显不同,而其他预测因素相似。由于多种原因,包括诊所的自我选择和不同的临床实践,不同群体的模式可能有所不同。