Richardson Paul G, Sonneveld Pieter, Schuster Michael W, Irwin David, Stadtmauer Edward A, Facon Thierry, Harousseau Jean-Luc, Ben-Yehuda Dina, Lonial Sagar, Goldschmidt Hartmut, Reece Donna, San-Miguel Jesus F, Bladé Joan, Boccadoro Mario, Cavenagh Jamie, Dalton William S, Boral Anthony L, Esseltine Dixie L, Porter Jane B, Schenkein David, Anderson Kenneth C
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
N Engl J Med. 2005 Jun 16;352(24):2487-98. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa043445.
This study compared bortezomib with high-dose dexamethasone in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma who had received one to three previous therapies.
We randomly assigned 669 patients with relapsed myeloma to receive either an intravenous bolus of bortezomib (1.3 mg per square meter of body-surface area) on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 for eight three-week cycles, followed by treatment on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 for three five-week cycles, or high-dose dexamethasone (40 mg orally) on days 1 through 4, 9 through 12, and 17 through 20 for four five-week cycles, followed by treatment on days 1 through 4 for five four-week cycles. Patients who were assigned to receive dexamethasone were permitted to cross over to receive bortezomib in a companion study after disease progression.
Patients treated with bortezomib had higher response rates, a longer time to progression (the primary end point), and a longer survival than patients treated with dexamethasone. The combined complete and partial response rates were 38 percent for bortezomib and 18 percent for dexamethasone (P<0.001), and the complete response rates were 6 percent and less than 1 percent, respectively (P<0.001). Median times to progression in the bortezomib and dexamethasone groups were 6.22 months (189 days) and 3.49 months (106 days), respectively (hazard ratio, 0.55; P<0.001). The one-year survival rate was 80 percent among patients taking bortezomib and 66 percent among patients taking dexamethasone (P=0.003), and the hazard ratio for overall survival with bortezomib was 0.57 (P=0.001). Grade 3 or 4 adverse events were reported in 75 percent of patients treated with bortezomib and in 60 percent of those treated with dexamethasone.
Bortezomib is superior to high-dose dexamethasone for the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma who have had a relapse after one to three previous therapies.
本研究比较了硼替佐米与大剂量地塞米松在接受过1至3次前期治疗的复发多发性骨髓瘤患者中的疗效。
我们将669例复发骨髓瘤患者随机分组,一组患者在第1、4、8和11天静脉推注硼替佐米(1.3mg/每平方米体表面积),每3周为一个周期,共8个周期,之后在第1、8、15和22天进行治疗,每5周为一个周期,共3个周期;另一组患者在第1至4天、第9至12天和第17至20天口服大剂量地塞米松(40mg),每5周为一个周期,共4个周期,之后在第1至4天进行治疗,每4周为一个周期,共5个周期。分配接受地塞米松治疗的患者在疾病进展后可在一项配套研究中交叉接受硼替佐米治疗。
与接受地塞米松治疗的患者相比,接受硼替佐米治疗的患者缓解率更高、疾病进展时间(主要终点)更长、生存期更长。硼替佐米组的完全缓解率与部分缓解率之和为38%,地塞米松组为18%(P<0.001),完全缓解率分别为6%和不到1%(P<0.001)。硼替佐米组和地塞米松组的中位疾病进展时间分别为6.22个月(189天)和3.49个月(106天)(风险比,0.55;P<0.001)。服用硼替佐米的患者1年生存率为80%,服用地塞米松的患者为66%(P=0.003),硼替佐米组总生存的风险比为0.57(P=0.001)。接受硼替佐米治疗的患者中有75%报告发生3级或4级不良事件,接受地塞米松治疗的患者中这一比例为60%。
对于接受过1至3次前期治疗后复发的多发性骨髓瘤患者,硼替佐米治疗优于大剂量地塞米松。