Nathan H J, Laganière S, Dubé L, Foster B, McGilveray I, Harrison M, Bourke M, Cattran C, de LaSalle G, Robblee J
Department of Anesthesia, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Anesth Analg. 1992 Jun;74(6):809-17. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199206000-00006.
We administered sodium nitroprusside (SNP) or nifedipine intravenously to patients who became hypertensive after elective coronary revascularization and compared their effects on hemodynamics and the electrocardiogram in a parallel, randomized, open-label study. Four of 21 patients treated with nifedipine required the addition of SNP to maintain mean arterial pressure less than 90 mm Hg, compared with 4 of 28 patients in the SNP group who required the addition of nifedipine. The success rates of nifedipine (81%) and SNP (86%) were not significantly different. There was no difference in the incidence of adverse ST-segment changes during drug infusion (4% versus 5%) or perioperative myocardial infarction (9.5% versus 10.7%) in the nifedipine versus SNP groups, respectively. The plasma nifedipine concentration (mean value +/- SD) at steady state for 21 patients receiving nifedipine was 119 +/- 42.5 ng/mL. The pharmacokinetic variables for nifedipine were as follows (mean values +/- SD): systemic clearance, 0.525 +/- 0.228 L.h-1.kg-1; apparent volume of distribution, 0.738 +/- 0.446 L/kg; and elimination half-life, 1.02 +/- 0.51 h. These values are similar to those reported previously in healthy volunteers. We conclude that intravenous nifedipine can be used safely to control hypertension after coronary revascularization but were unable to demonstrate an advantage of nifedipine compared with SNP in preventing postoperative ischemia or infarction in this group of patients who had good left ventricular function.