Sutter Christine, Ziefle Martina
Department of Psychology, RWTH Aachen University, Jaegerstrasse 17-19, 52056 Aachen, Germany.
Hum Factors. 2005 Spring;47(1):169-87. doi: 10.1518/0018720053653893.
In the present study the usability of two different types of notebook input devices was examined. The independent variables were input device (touchpad vs. mini-joystick) and user expertise (expert vs. novice state). There were 30 participants, of whom 15 were touchpad experts and the other 15 were mini-joystick experts. The experimental tasks were a point-click task (Experiment 1) and a point-drag-drop task (Experiment 2). Dependent variables were the time and accuracy of cursor control. To assess carryover effects, we had the participants complete both experiments, using not only the input device for which they were experts but also the device for which they were novices. Results showed the touchpad performance to be clearly superior to mini-joystick performance. Overall, experts showed better performance than did novices. The significant interaction of input device and expertise showed that the use of an unknown device is difficult, but only for touchpad experts, who were remarkably slower and less accurate when using a mini-joystick. Actual and potential applications of this research include an evaluation of current notebook input devices. The outcomes allow ergonomic guidelines to be derived for optimized usage and design of the mini-joystick and touchpad devices.
在本研究中,对两种不同类型的笔记本电脑输入设备的可用性进行了检验。自变量为输入设备(触摸板与迷你操纵杆)和用户专业程度(专家级与新手级)。共有30名参与者,其中15名是触摸板专家,另外15名是迷你操纵杆专家。实验任务为点击任务(实验1)和拖放任务(实验2)。因变量为光标控制的时间和准确性。为评估延续效应,我们让参与者完成这两项实验,不仅使用他们所擅长的输入设备,还使用他们不擅长的设备。结果显示,触摸板的性能明显优于迷你操纵杆。总体而言,专家的表现优于新手。输入设备与专业程度之间的显著交互作用表明,使用不熟悉的设备存在困难,但仅对触摸板专家而言,他们在使用迷你操纵杆时速度明显较慢且准确性较低。本研究的实际和潜在应用包括对当前笔记本电脑输入设备的评估。研究结果可为优化迷你操纵杆和触摸板设备的使用及设计得出人体工程学准则。