Racca Fabrizio, Appendini Lorenzo, Gregoretti Cesare, Stra Elisa, Patessio Antonio, Donner Claudio F, Ranieri V Marco
Dipartimento di Anestesia e Rianimazione, Università di Torino, Ospedale S. Giovanni Battista-Molinette, Italy.
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2005 Oct;99(4):1262-71. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01363.2004. Epub 2005 Jun 16.
The helmet, a transparent latex-free polyvinyl chloride cylinder linked by a metallic ring to a soft collar that seals the helmet around the neck, has been recently proposed as an effective alternative to conventional face mask to deliver pressure support ventilation (PSV) during noninvasive ventilation in patients with acute respiratory failure. We tested the hypothesis that mechanical characteristics of the helmet (large internal volume and high compliance) might impair patient-ventilator interactions compared with standard face mask. Breathing pattern, CO(2) clearance, indexes of inspiratory muscle effort and patient-ventilator asynchrony, and dyspnea were measured at different levels of PSV delivered by face mask and helmet in six healthy volunteers before (load-off) and after (load-on) application of a linear resistor. During load-off, no differences in breathing pattern and inspiratory muscle effort were found. During load-on, the use of helmet to deliver pressure support increased inspiratory muscle effort and patient-ventilator asynchrony, worsened CO(2) clearance, and increased dyspnea compared with standard face mask. Autocycled breaths accounted for 12 and 25% of the total minute ventilation and for 10 and 23% of the total inspiratory muscle effort during mask and helmet PSV, respectively. We conclude that PSV delivered by helmet interface is less effective in unloading inspiratory muscles compared with PSV delivered by standard face mask. Other ventilatory assist modes should be tested to exploit to the most the potential benefits offered by the helmet.
头盔是一个由金属环连接到软颈圈的透明无乳胶聚氯乙烯圆柱体,该颈圈可在颈部周围密封头盔。最近有人提出,在急性呼吸衰竭患者的无创通气过程中,头盔是一种有效的替代传统面罩来提供压力支持通气(PSV)的方法。我们检验了这样一个假设:与标准面罩相比,头盔的机械特性(大的内部容积和高顺应性)可能会损害患者与呼吸机的相互作用。在六名健康志愿者中,于应用线性电阻器之前(负荷解除)和之后(负荷增加),在面罩和头盔提供的不同PSV水平下,测量呼吸模式、二氧化碳清除率、吸气肌努力指标、患者与呼吸机的不同步情况以及呼吸困难程度。在负荷解除期间,未发现呼吸模式和吸气肌努力有差异。在负荷增加期间,与标准面罩相比,使用头盔提供压力支持会增加吸气肌努力和患者与呼吸机的不同步情况,使二氧化碳清除率恶化,并增加呼吸困难程度。在面罩和头盔PSV期间,自动循环呼吸分别占总分钟通气量的12%和25%,以及总吸气肌努力的10%和23%。我们得出结论,与标准面罩提供的PSV相比,头盔接口提供的PSV在减轻吸气肌负荷方面效果较差。应测试其他通气辅助模式,以充分利用头盔提供的潜在益处。