Pongraweewan Orawan, Lertakyamanee Jariya, Luangnateethep Ungkana, Pooviboonsuk Prakorb, Nanthaniran Mayuree, Sathanasaowapak Pariyacha, Chainchop Petcharee
Department of Anesthesiology, Siriraj Hospital, 2 Prannok Rd, Bangkoknoi, Bangkok 10700, Thailand.
J Med Assoc Thai. 2005 Mar;88(3):371-6.
In the present prospective, randomized controlled trial, 110 unpremedicated patients undergoing orthopedic surgery under regional anesthesia were randomly divided into 5 groups, with 22 patients in each. During the operation, group 1 listened to a pre-recorded explanation and music, group 2 listened to a subliminal sound, group 3 received propofol by patient-controlled sedation (PCS), group 4 received intravenous midazolam, and group 5 was the control group. Patients in the midazolam group were significantly more sedated than the control group at 1 hr into the operation. The group that listened to an explanation and music were significantly less satisfied than the propofol group at the end of the operation and 30 min. postoperatively. An incremental cost-effectiveness ratio showed that if explanation and music are used instead of propofol it would save 299.53 baht per patient, but the patient satisfaction score will be 17.26 points lower than if the more expensive drug is used.
在这项前瞻性随机对照试验中,110例未接受术前用药、接受区域麻醉下骨科手术的患者被随机分为5组,每组22例。手术期间,第1组听预先录制的讲解和音乐,第2组听阈下声音,第3组通过患者自控镇静(PCS)接受丙泊酚,第4组接受静脉注射咪达唑仑,第5组为对照组。咪达唑仑组患者在手术开始1小时时的镇静程度明显高于对照组。在手术结束时和术后30分钟,听讲解和音乐的组的满意度明显低于丙泊酚组。增量成本效益比显示,如果用讲解和音乐代替丙泊酚,每名患者可节省299.53泰铢,但患者满意度得分将比使用更昂贵药物时低17.26分。