Nápoles-Springer Anna M, Santoyo Jasmine, Stewart Anita L
Center for Aging in Diverse Communities, Medical Effectiveness Research Center for Diverse Populations, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94118-1944, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2005 May;20(5):438-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0078.x.
Limited evidence exists on the effectiveness of recruitment methods among diverse populations.
Describe response rates by recruitment stage, ethnic-language group, and type of initial contact letter (for African-American and Latino patients).
Tracking of response status by recruitment stage and ethnic-language group and a randomized trial of ethnically tailored initial letters nested within a cross-sectional telephone survey on physician-patient communication.
Adult general medicine patients with >or=1 visit during the preceding year, stratified by 4 categories: African-American (N= 1,400), English-speaking Latino (N= 894), Spanish-speaking Latino (N= 965), and non-Latino white (N= 1,400).
Ethnically tailored initial letters referred to shortages of African-American (or Latino) physicians and the need to learn about the experiences of African-American (or Latino) patients communicating with physicians. Of 2,482 patients contacted, eligible, and able to participate (identified eligibles), 69.9% completed the survey. Thirty-nine percent of the sampling frame was unable to be contacted, with losses higher among non-Latino whites (46.5%) and African Americans (44.2%) than among English-speaking (32.3%) and Spanish-speaking Latinos (25.1%). For identified eligibles, response rates were highest among Spanish-speaking Latinos (75.2%), lowest for non-Latino whites (66.4%), and intermediate for African Americans (69.7%) and English-speaking Latinos (68.1%). There were no differences in overall response rates between patients receiving ethnically tailored letters (72.2%) and those receiving general letters (70.0%).
Household contact and individual response rates differed by ethnic-language group, highlighting the importance of tracking losses by stage and subpopulation. Careful attention to recruitment yielded acceptable response rates among all groups.
关于不同人群中招募方法的有效性,现有证据有限。
按招募阶段、种族语言群体和初始联系信类型(针对非裔美国人和拉丁裔患者)描述回复率。
按招募阶段和种族语言群体追踪回复状态,并在一项关于医患沟通的横断面电话调查中对按种族定制的初始信件进行随机试验。
上一年就诊次数≥1次的成年普通内科患者,分为4类:非裔美国人(N = 1400)、说英语的拉丁裔(N = 894)、说西班牙语的拉丁裔(N = 965)和非拉丁裔白人(N = 1400)。
按种族定制的初始联系信提到非裔美国人(或拉丁裔)医生短缺以及了解非裔美国人(或拉丁裔)患者与医生沟通经历的必要性。在2482名被联系、符合条件且能够参与的患者(确定的合格者)中,69.9%完成了调查。抽样框架中有39%无法联系到,非拉丁裔白人(46.5%)和非裔美国人(44.2%)的失访率高于说英语的拉丁裔(32.3%)和说西班牙语的拉丁裔(25.1%)。对于确定的合格者,回复率在说西班牙语的拉丁裔中最高(75.2%),在非拉丁裔白人中最低(66.4%),非裔美国人(69.7%)和说英语的拉丁裔(68.1%)处于中间水平。收到按种族定制信件的患者(72.2%)和收到通用信件的患者(70.0%)的总体回复率没有差异。
家庭联系率和个人回复率因种族语言群体而异,突出了按阶段和亚群体追踪失访情况的重要性。对招募工作的仔细关注在所有群体中都产生了可接受的回复率。