Suppr超能文献

人际护理过程调查:不同群体的患者报告测量方法。

Interpersonal processes of care survey: patient-reported measures for diverse groups.

作者信息

Stewart Anita L, Nápoles-Springer Anna M, Gregorich Steven E, Santoyo-Olsson Jasmine

机构信息

Center for Aging in Diverse Communities, Medical Effectiveness Research Center for Diverse Populations, Institute for Health and Aging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94118-1944, USA.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 2007 Jun;42(3 Pt 1):1235-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00637.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To create a patient-reported, multidimensional physician/patient interpersonal processes of care (IPC) instrument appropriate for patients from diverse racial/ethnic groups that allows reliable, valid, and unbiased comparisons across these groups. DATA SOURCE/DATA COLLECTION: Data were collected by telephone interview. The survey was administered in English and Spanish to adult general medicine patients, stratified by race/ethnicity and language (African Americans, English-speaking Latinos, Spanish-speaking Latinos, non-Latino whites) (N=1,664).

STUDY DESIGN/METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, items were designed to be appropriate for diverse ethnic groups based on focus groups, our prior framework, literature, and cognitive interviews. Multitrait scaling and confirmatory factor analysis were used to examine measurement invariance; we identified scales that allowed meaningful quantitative comparisons across four race/ethnic/language groups.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

The final instrument assesses several subdomains of communication, patient-centered decision making, and interpersonal style. It includes 29 items representing 12 first-order and seven second-order factors with equivalent meaning (metric invariance) across groups; 18 items (seven factors) allowed unbiased mean comparison across groups (scalar invariance). Final scales exhibited moderate to high reliability.

CONCLUSIONS

The IPC survey can be used to describe disparities in interpersonal care, predict patient outcomes, and examine outcomes of quality improvement efforts to reduce health care disparities.

摘要

目的

创建一种患者报告的多维医患人际护理过程(IPC)工具,该工具适用于不同种族/族裔群体的患者,能够在这些群体之间进行可靠、有效且无偏差的比较。

数据来源/数据收集:通过电话访谈收集数据。该调查以英语和西班牙语对成年普通内科患者进行,按种族/族裔和语言分层(非裔美国人、说英语的拉丁裔、说西班牙语的拉丁裔、非拉丁裔白人)(N = 1664)。

研究设计/方法:在这项横断面研究中,根据焦点小组、我们先前的框架、文献和认知访谈,设计出适用于不同种族群体的项目。采用多特质量表法和验证性因素分析来检验测量不变性;我们确定了能够在四个种族/族裔/语言群体之间进行有意义的定量比较的量表。

主要发现

最终工具评估了沟通、以患者为中心的决策制定和人际风格几个子领域。它包括29个项目,代表12个一阶因素和7个二阶因素,各群体之间具有等效含义(度量不变性);18个项目(7个因素)允许在各群体之间进行无偏差的均值比较(标量不变性)。最终量表表现出中等到高的信度。

结论

IPC调查可用于描述人际护理中的差异、预测患者预后,并检验为减少医疗保健差异而进行的质量改进努力的结果。

相似文献

1
Interpersonal processes of care survey: patient-reported measures for diverse groups.
Health Serv Res. 2007 Jun;42(3 Pt 1):1235-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00637.x.
2
The patient-reported Clinicians' Cultural Sensitivity Survey: a field test among older Latino primary care patients.
Health Expect. 2012 Mar;15(1):63-77. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2010.00654.x. Epub 2011 Jan 11.
3
Interpersonal processes of care and patient satisfaction: do associations differ by race, ethnicity, and language?
Health Serv Res. 2009 Aug;44(4):1326-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.00965.x. Epub 2009 Mar 31.
5
Racial and ethnic disparities and perceptions of health care: does health plan type matter?
Health Serv Res. 2005 Apr;40(2):551-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00372.x.
9
Racial and ethnic differences in patient perceptions of bias and cultural competence in health care.
J Gen Intern Med. 2004 Feb;19(2):101-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30262.x.
10
Using cognitive interviews to develop surveys in diverse populations.
Med Care. 2006 Nov;44(11 Suppl 3):S21-30. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000245425.65905.1d.

引用本文的文献

4
Patient-clinician communication amongst black perinatal people: a systematic review.
Arch Womens Ment Health. 2025 Mar 11. doi: 10.1007/s00737-025-01574-1.
8
Race and ethnicity and self-reported racial/ethnic discrimination in breast cancer patient interactions with providers in the Pathways Study.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2025 Jan;209(2):355-366. doi: 10.1007/s10549-024-07499-0. Epub 2024 Oct 5.
9
A Model for Engaging Citizen Scientists: A Community-Partnered Research Collaboration to Address Inequities for Black Birthing People.
Matern Child Health J. 2024 Sep;28(9):1495-1505. doi: 10.1007/s10995-024-03974-8. Epub 2024 Aug 7.
10
Patient-reported assessment of compassion in Spanish: a systematic review.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Jul 10;11:1352694. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1352694. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Structural Model Evaluation and Modification: An Interval Estimation Approach.
Multivariate Behav Res. 1990 Apr 1;25(2):173-80. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr2502_4.
3
Using cognitive interviews to develop surveys in diverse populations.
Med Care. 2006 Nov;44(11 Suppl 3):S21-30. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000245425.65905.1d.
4
Patients' preferences for technical versus interpersonal quality when selecting a primary care physician.
Health Serv Res. 2005 Aug;40(4):957-77. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00395.x.
6
Patients' perceptions of cultural factors affecting the quality of their medical encounters.
Health Expect. 2005 Mar;8(1):4-17. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2004.00298.x.
8
Strategies for improving minority healthcare quality.
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ). 2004 Jan(90):1-8. doi: 10.1037/e439452005-001.
9
Physician-patient dialogue surrounding patients' expression of concern: applying sequence analysis to RIAS.
Soc Sci Med. 2004 Jul;59(1):145-55. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.10.011.
10
Racial and ethnic differences in patient perceptions of bias and cultural competence in health care.
J Gen Intern Med. 2004 Feb;19(2):101-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30262.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验