Witte Daniel R, Westerink Jan, de Koning Eelco J, van der Graaf Yolanda, Grobbee Diederick E, Bots Michiel L
Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heiderberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, the Netherlands.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Jun 21;45(12):1987-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.02.073.
The aim of this research was to study whether the relation between endothelial function measured by flow-mediated dilation (FMD) of the brachial artery and cardiovascular risk factors is affected by the baseline cardiovascular risk.
Flow-mediated dilation of the brachial artery is widely used as a measure of endothelial function. Relations between FMD and most cardiovascular risk factors have been described.
We performed a meta-regression analysis of 211 selected articles (399 populations) reporting on FMD and cardiovascular risk factors. Mean values of FMD; age; proportion of men; proportion of smokers; blood pressure; lipids; glucose; and the presence of diabetes mellitus, of hyperlipidemia, and of hypertension were retrieved from the articles. The 10-year risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) for each population was estimated based on the Framingham risk score. The relation between FMD and cardiovascular risk factors was assessed within each risk category by linear regression analysis, adjusting for age and gender, and weighted for the study size.
A relation between FMD and cardiovascular risk factors was most clear in the category with lowest baseline risk (below 2.8% per decade). In populations with low baseline risk, for each % increase in Framingham risk, FMD decreased by 1.42% (95% confidence interval: 0.65 to 2.19). In medium- and high-risk populations, FMD was not related to risk (-0.02% [-0.27 to 0.22] and 0.06% [-0.02 to 0.13], respectively). These findings were independent of differences in brachial lumen diameter and technical aspects of the FMD measurement.
Only in populations at low risk, endothelial function measured by FMD is related to the principal cardiovascular risk factors, and to the estimated 10-year risk of CHD.
本研究旨在探讨通过肱动脉血流介导的血管舒张功能(FMD)测量的内皮功能与心血管危险因素之间的关系是否受基线心血管风险的影响。
肱动脉血流介导的血管舒张功能被广泛用作内皮功能的测量指标。FMD与大多数心血管危险因素之间的关系已有描述。
我们对211篇选定的文章(399个群体)进行了荟萃回归分析,这些文章报告了FMD与心血管危险因素。从文章中获取FMD的平均值、年龄、男性比例、吸烟者比例、血压、血脂、血糖以及糖尿病、高脂血症和高血压的存在情况。根据弗雷明汉风险评分估算每个群体患冠心病(CHD)的10年风险。通过线性回归分析评估每个风险类别中FMD与心血管危险因素之间的关系,对年龄和性别进行调整,并根据研究规模进行加权。
FMD与心血管危险因素之间的关系在基线风险最低的类别(每十年低于2.8%)中最为明显。在基线风险较低的人群中,弗雷明汉风险每增加1%,FMD下降1.42%(95%置信区间:0.65至2.19)。在中高危人群中,FMD与风险无关(分别为-0.02%[-0.27至0.22]和0.06%[-0.02至0.13])。这些发现与肱动脉管腔直径的差异以及FMD测量的技术方面无关。
仅在低风险人群中,通过FMD测量的内皮功能与主要心血管危险因素以及估计的10年CHD风险相关。