Suppr超能文献

在急诊室环境中,能否通过肺部听诊来评估气道阻塞情况?

Can airway obstruction be estimated by lung auscultation in an emergency room setting?

作者信息

Leuppi Jörg D, Dieterle Thomas, Wildeisen Irène, Martina Benedict, Tamm Michael, Koch Gian, Perruchoud André P, Leimenstoll Bernd M

机构信息

Pneumology, Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Switzerland.

出版信息

Respir Med. 2006 Feb;100(2):279-85. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2005.05.005. Epub 2005 Jun 17.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Lung auscultation is a central part of the physical examination at hospital admission. In this study, the physicians' estimation of airway obstruction by auscultation was determined and compared with the degree of airway obstruction as measured by FEV(1)/FVC values.

METHODS

Two hundred and thirty-three patients consecutively admitted to the medical emergency room with chest problems were included. After taking their history, patients were auscultated by an Internal Medicine registrar. The degree of airway obstruction had to be estimated (0=no, 1=mild, 2=moderate and 3=severe obstructed) and then spirometry was performed. Airway obstruction was defined as a ratio of FEV(1)/FVC <70%. The degree of airway obstruction was defined on FEV(1)/FVC as mild (FEV(1)/FVC <70% and >50%), moderate (FEV(1)/FVC <50% >30%) and severe (FEV(1)/FVC <30%).

RESULTS

One hundred and thirty-five patients (57.9%) had no sign of airway obstruction (FEV(1)/FVC >70%). Spirometry showed a mild obstruction in 51 patients (21.9%), a moderate obstruction in 27 patients (11.6%) and a severe obstruction in 20 patients (8.6%). There was a weak but significant correlation between FEV(1)/FVC and the auscultation-based estimation of airway obstruction in Internal Medicine Registrars (Spearman's rho=0.328; P<0.001). The sensitivity to detect airway obstruction by lung auscultation was 72.6% and the specificity only 46.3%. Thus, the negative predictive value was 68% and the positive predictive value 51%. In 27 patients (9.7%), airway obstruction was missed by lung auscultation. In these 27 cases, the severity of airway obstruction was mild in 20 patients, moderate in 5 patients and severe in 2 patients. In 82 patients (29.4%) with no sign of airway obstruction (FEV(1)/FVC >70%), airway obstruction was wrongly estimated as mild in 42 patients, as moderate in 34 patients and as severe in 6 patients, respectively. By performing multiple logistic regression, normal lung auscultation was a significant and independent predictor for not having an airway obstruction (OR 2.48 (1.43-4.28); P=0.001).

CONCLUSION

Under emergency room conditions, physicians can quite accurately exclude airway obstruction by auscultation. Normal lung auscultation is an independent predictor for not having an airway obstruction. However, airway obstruction is often overestimated by auscultation; thus, spirometry should be performed.

摘要

目的

肺部听诊是入院体格检查的核心部分。在本研究中,确定了医生通过听诊对气道阻塞的评估,并与通过FEV(1)/FVC值测量的气道阻塞程度进行比较。

方法

纳入233例因胸部问题连续入住急诊科的患者。在询问病史后,由内科住院医师对患者进行听诊。必须评估气道阻塞程度(0 = 无,1 = 轻度,2 = 中度,3 = 重度阻塞),然后进行肺功能测定。气道阻塞定义为FEV(1)/FVC比值<70%。根据FEV(1)/FVC将气道阻塞程度定义为轻度(FEV(1)/FVC <70%且>50%)、中度(FEV(1)/FVC <50%>30%)和重度(FEV(1)/FVC <30%)。

结果

135例患者(57.9%)无气道阻塞迹象(FEV(1)/FVC >70%)。肺功能测定显示51例患者(21.9%)为轻度阻塞,27例患者(11.6%)为中度阻塞,20例患者(8.6%)为重度阻塞。内科住院医师根据FEV(1)/FVC对气道阻塞的听诊评估与实际情况之间存在弱但显著的相关性(Spearman相关系数rho = 0.328;P <0.001)。肺部听诊检测气道阻塞的敏感性为72.6%,特异性仅为46.3%。因此,阴性预测值为68%,阳性预测值为51%。27例患者(9.7%)肺部听诊漏诊了气道阻塞。在这27例病例中,20例患者气道阻塞程度为轻度,5例为中度,2例为重度。在82例无气道阻塞迹象(FEV(1)/FVC >70%)的患者中,分别有42例、34例和6例被错误地估计为轻度、中度和重度气道阻塞。通过多因素logistic回归分析,正常肺部听诊是无气道阻塞的显著且独立预测因素(OR 2.48(1.43 - 4.28);P = 0.001)。

结论

在急诊室条件下,医生通过听诊可以相当准确地排除气道阻塞。正常肺部听诊是无气道阻塞的独立预测因素。然而,听诊常高估气道阻塞情况;因此,应进行肺功能测定。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验