Reichman Nancy E, Teitler Julien O
Department of Pediatrics, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, NJ 08903, USA.
Matern Child Health J. 2005 Jun;9(2):151-8. doi: 10.1007/s10995-005-4905-3.
This study examined the effects of prenatal care and the timing of its initiation on birth weight and gestational age outcomes among women in a state-wide Medicaid enhanced prenatal care program.
Ordinary Least Squares and logistic regression analyses were performed using data on 88,196 births in New Jersey between 1988 and 1996. A large number of potentially confounding factors were included.
Initiating prenatal care in the first trimester was associated with a 56 g advantage in birth weight (p = .01) compared to no care. Initiating prenatal care in the first or second trimester was associated with a 1 day advantage in gestational age (p = .05). There were no significant effects of prenatal care, initiated in any trimester, on low-birth weight. Initiating care in the first versus the second trimester had no effect on the probability of delivering preterm. The findings did not vary by sociodemographic subgroup.
This study provides support for claims that there is little that prenatal care can do to improve aggregate birth outcomes because most pregnancy complications are the result of behaviors and life circumstances that precede the pregnancy and are very difficult to reverse. Prenatal care, even with enhanced services, appears to offer too little, too late.
本研究考察了在一项全州范围内的医疗补助强化产前护理项目中,产前护理及其开始时间对女性分娩体重和孕周结果的影响。
使用1988年至1996年间新泽西州88196例分娩的数据进行普通最小二乘法和逻辑回归分析。纳入了大量潜在的混杂因素。
与未接受护理相比,在孕早期开始产前护理与出生体重增加56克相关(p = .01)。在孕早期或孕中期开始产前护理与孕周增加1天相关(p = .05)。在任何孕周开始的产前护理对低出生体重均无显著影响。在孕早期与孕中期开始护理对早产概率没有影响。研究结果在社会人口学亚组中没有差异。
本研究支持了以下观点,即产前护理对改善总体分娩结果作用不大,因为大多数妊娠并发症是怀孕前的行为和生活环境导致的,且很难逆转。产前护理,即使是强化服务,似乎提供的太少、太晚。