Dubay L, Joyce T, Kaestner R, Kenney G M
The Urban Institute, Washington, DC 20037, USA.
Health Serv Res. 2001 Jun;36(2):373-98.
To conduct the first national study that assesses whether the Medicaid expansions for pregnant women, legislated by Congress over a decade ago, met the policy objectives of improved access to care and birth outcomes for poor and near-poor women.
DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: Data on 8.1 million births using the 1980, 1986, and 1993 National Natality Files. We use births from all areas of the United States except California, Texas, Washington, and upstate New York.
We conduct a before and after analysis that compares obstetrical outcomes by race and socioeconomic status for the periods 1980-86 and 1986-93. We examine whether women of low socioeconomic status showed greater improvements in outcomes during the 1986-93 period compared to the 1980-86 period. We analyze two obstetrical outcomes: the rate of late initiation of prenatal care and the rate of low birth weight.
Natality data were aggregated to race, socioeconomic status, age, and parity groups.
During the 1986-93 period, rates of late initiation of prenatal care decreased by 6.0 to 7.8 percentage points beyond changes estimated for the 1980-86 period for both white and African American women of low socioeconomic status. For some white women of low socioeconomic status, the rate of low birth weight was reduced by 0.26 to 0.37 percentage points between 1986 and 1993 relative to the earlier period. Other white women of low socioeconomic status and all African American women of low socioeconomic status showed no relative improvement in the rate of low birth weight during the 1986-93 period.
The expansions in Medicaid lead to significant improvements in prenatal care utilization among women of low socioeconomic status. The emerging lesson from the Medicaid expansions, however, is that increased access to primary care is not adequate if the goal is to narrow the gap in newborn health between poor and nonpoor populations.
开展首次全国性研究,评估国会在十多年前立法的针对孕妇的医疗补助扩大计划是否实现了改善贫困和接近贫困妇女获得医疗服务的机会以及生育结局的政策目标。
数据来源/研究背景:使用1980年、1986年和1993年全国出生档案中的810万例出生数据。我们使用了美国除加利福尼亚州、得克萨斯州、华盛顿州和纽约州北部以外所有地区的出生数据。
我们进行了一项前后对比分析,比较了1980 - 1986年和1986 - 1993年期间按种族和社会经济地位划分的产科结局。我们研究了社会经济地位低的妇女在1986 - 1993年期间的结局改善是否比1980 - 1986年期间更大。我们分析了两个产科结局:产前护理开始过晚的比率和低出生体重比率。
出生数据按种族、社会经济地位、年龄和平等分组进行汇总。
在1986 - 1993年期间,社会经济地位低的白人和非裔美国妇女产前护理开始过晚的比率比1980 - 1986年期间估计的变化幅度又下降了6.0至7.8个百分点。对于一些社会经济地位低的白人妇女,1986年至1993年期间低出生体重比率相对于早期下降了0.26至0.37个百分点。其他社会经济地位低的白人妇女以及所有社会经济地位低的非裔美国妇女在1986 - 1993年期间低出生体重比率没有相对改善。
医疗补助的扩大显著改善了社会经济地位低的妇女对产前护理的利用。然而,从医疗补助扩大中得出的新教训是,如果目标是缩小贫困和非贫困人群新生儿健康差距,增加获得初级保健的机会是不够的。