Creamer Jonathan I, Quickenden Terence I, Crichton Leah B, Robertson Patrick, Ruhayel Rasha A
Chemistry, M313, School of Biomedical and Chemical Sciences, Centre for Forensic Science, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia.
Luminescence. 2005 Nov-Dec;20(6):411-3. doi: 10.1002/bio.865.
The forensic luminol test has long been valued for its ability to detect trace amounts of blood that are invisible to the naked eye. This is the first quantitative study to determine the effect on the luminol test when an attempt is made to clean bloodstained tiles with a known interfering catalyst (bleach). Tiles covered with either wet or dry blood were tested, and either water or sodium hypochlorite solution (bleach) was used to clean the tiles. As expected, the chemiluminescence intensity produced when luminol was applied generally decreased with the number of times that a tile was cleaned with water, until the chemiluminescence was neither visible nor detectable. However, when the tiles were cleaned with bleach there was an initial drop in chemiluminescence intensity, followed by a rise to a consistently high value, visibly indistinguishable from that of blood. Examination of bleach drying time suggested that any interfering effect becomes negligible after 8 h.
法医鲁米诺测试长期以来因其能够检测肉眼不可见的微量血迹而受到重视。这是第一项定量研究,旨在确定当试图用一种已知的干扰催化剂(漂白剂)清洁沾有血迹的瓷砖时,对鲁米诺测试的影响。测试了覆盖有湿血或干血的瓷砖,并使用水或次氯酸钠溶液(漂白剂)清洁瓷砖。正如预期的那样,随着用水清洁瓷砖次数的增加,施加鲁米诺时产生的化学发光强度通常会降低,直到化学发光既不可见也无法检测到。然而,当用漂白剂清洁瓷砖时,化学发光强度最初会下降,随后会上升到一个始终很高的值,与血液产生的化学发光强度在视觉上无法区分。对漂白剂干燥时间的检查表明,8小时后任何干扰作用都可以忽略不计。