• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在新时代问责制下打造更出色的董事会。

Building better boards in the new era of accountability.

作者信息

Orlikoff James E

机构信息

Orlikoff & Associates, Inc., Chicago, USA.

出版信息

Front Health Serv Manage. 2005 Spring;21(3):3-12.

PMID:15966533
Abstract

Healthcare boards are entering a new era of heightened accountability, scrutiny, and reform. Sarbanes-Oxley legislation, Internal Revenue Service scrutiny, pressure from creditors and bond insurers, activist state attorneys general, media attention, and other forces have sharply increased awareness of the importance of governance and have also raised the bar on what is required of boards and what is considered best-practice governance performance. Yet good governance cannot be legislated. The structure, composition, and specific required functions of boards can be legislated or mandated, but the effective function of boards cannot. At the same time that governance faces this new era of accountability, it is also being bombarded with the legions of monumental challenges in the tumultuous healthcare field. Chief executive officers and their boards must be willing to recognize the challenges and risks to the field of governance in general and to their boards in particular. Furthermore, they must be willing to implement new strategies and approaches for successful governance, including becoming compliant with Sarbanes-Oxley requirements; conducting a comprehensive audit of the structure, function, composition, and culture of the board; and seeking board members from outside the community, among many others.

摘要

医疗保健委员会正步入一个问责性增强、审查力度加大和改革深入的新时代。萨班斯-奥克斯利法案、美国国税局的审查、债权人和债券保险公司的压力、积极的州检察长、媒体关注以及其他因素,都极大地提高了人们对治理重要性的认识,同时也提高了对董事会要求以及最佳治理绩效标准的门槛。然而,良好的治理无法通过立法实现。董事会的结构、组成和具体规定的职能可以通过立法或强制规定,但董事会的有效职能却不能。在治理面临这个新的问责时代的同时,它也在动荡的医疗保健领域中受到众多巨大挑战的冲击。首席执行官及其董事会必须愿意认识到治理领域总体上以及其董事会尤其面临的挑战和风险。此外,他们必须愿意实施成功治理的新战略和方法,包括遵守萨班斯-奥克斯利法案的要求;对董事会的结构、职能、组成和文化进行全面审计;从外部社区寻找董事会成员等等。

相似文献

1
Building better boards in the new era of accountability.在新时代问责制下打造更出色的董事会。
Front Health Serv Manage. 2005 Spring;21(3):3-12.
2
States turn up the heat. As self-regulation sputters, state legislatures are leading charge for more accountability in governance of not-for-profit hospitals.
Mod Healthc. 2006 Jan 30;36(5):6-7, 16, 1.
3
Taking the prudent path. Best practices for not-for-profit boards.走审慎之路。非营利组织董事会的最佳实践。
Trustee. 2003 Nov-Dec;56(10):24-7, 1.
4
The internal processes and behavioral dynamics of hospital boards: an exploration of differences between high- and low-performing hospitals.医院董事会的内部流程与行为动态:高绩效与低绩效医院差异探究
Health Care Manage Rev. 2009 Jan-Mar;34(1):80-91. doi: 10.1097/01.HMR.0000342980.30049.4b.
5
Governance: critical issues for hospital CEO and boards.治理:医院首席执行官和董事会面临的关键问题。
Front Health Serv Manage. 2005 Spring;21(3):25-9; discussion 43-4.
6
The changing face of healthcare boards.
Front Health Serv Manage. 2005 Spring;21(3):31-5; discussion 43-4.
7
Priority issues for hospital boards.医院董事会的优先事项。
Front Health Serv Manage. 2005 Spring;21(3):13-24.
8
Thinking of boards as families.
Health Syst Lead. 1995 May;2(4):19-21.
9
Size, composition, and culture of high-performing hospital boards.
Am J Med Qual. 2006 Jul-Aug;21(4):224-9. doi: 10.1177/1062860606289628.
10
Hospital governance and market share.医院管理与市场份额。
Inquiry. 1981 Fall;18(3):255-65.

引用本文的文献

1
Hospital Board of Directors' Composition and Financial Performance: Empirical Evidence from Taiwan.医院董事会构成与财务绩效:来自台湾的实证证据。
Inquiry. 2021 Jan-Dec;58:469580211024897. doi: 10.1177/00469580211024897.
2
Is having quality as an item on the executive board agenda associated with the implementation of quality management systems in European hospitals: a quantitative analysis.将质量作为执行委员会会议议程的一项内容是否与欧洲医院质量管理体系的实施相关联:一项定量分析。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2014 Apr;26 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):92-9. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzu017. Epub 2014 Feb 17.
3
An exploratory study of alternative configurations of governing boards of substance abuse treatment centers.
探索性研究:滥用药物治疗中心管理委员会的替代配置。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2011 Sep;41(2):156-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2011.02.008. Epub 2011 Apr 13.
4
Hospital board infrastructure and functions: the role of governance in financial performance.医院董事会的基础设施与职能:治理在财务绩效中的作用
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2009 Mar;6(3):862-73. doi: 10.3390/ijerph6030862. Epub 2009 Feb 26.
5
An empirical taxonomy of hospital governing board roles.医院管理委员会角色的实证分类法。
Health Serv Res. 2008 Aug;43(4):1223-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2008.00835.x. Epub 2008 Mar 17.
6
Does governance matter? Board configuration and performance in not-for-profit hospitals.治理重要吗?非营利性医院的董事会结构与绩效
Milbank Q. 2006;84(4):733-58. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2006.00466.x.