Spyropoulos Evangelos, Christoforidis Charalambos, Borousas Dimitrios, Mavrikos Stamatios, Bourounis Michael, Athanasiadis Sotirios
Urology Department, Naval and Veterans Hospital of Athens, 24 Riga Fereou str., Paleo Faliro 17563, Athens, Greece.
Eur Urol. 2005 Jul;48(1):121-7; discussion 127-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.02.021. Epub 2005 Mar 16.
To report on the efficacy and safety of augmentation phalloplasty procedures in physically normal young men, to introduce a patient selection and outcome evaluation questionnaire as well as, to propose a surgical technique modification.
Eleven (11) out of 28 psychosomatically normal men (25-35 years) who presented complaining of penile dysmorphophobia (subjective perception of small penis), were subjected to: (a) penile lengthening (suprapubic skin advancement--ligamentolysis): n=5, (b) penile lengthening and shaft thickening (free dermal-fat graft shaft coverage): n=3 and (c) panniculectomy--suprapubic lipectomy and penile lengthening: n=2. A self administered questionnaire was employed in order to facilitate selection of the patients qualifying for the operation as well as to evaluate the outcome. In addition, a technical modification regarding dermal-fat graft handling was applied.
The postoperative course was uneventful with minor complications. The mean penile length gain (flaccid--stretched penis) was 1.6 cm (1-2.3 cm) [p=0.0014], the mean circumference gain was 2.3 cm [p=0.003] at the base and 2.6 cm [p=0.0012] subcoronaly. Significant (20%-53%) [p<0.0001] sexual self-esteem and functioning improvement was reported by the majority (91%) of patients.
Although penile size alteration was not spectacular or satisfying the patients' "great" expectations, the substantially uneventful clinical course coupled with the significant improvement in sexual self-esteem and function and the highly accepted outcome by the patients, render augmentation phalloplasty reasonable treatment modality for the management of strictly selected and thoroughly informed young adults who suffer from penile dysmorphophobia.
报告在身体正常的年轻男性中进行阴茎增大成形术的疗效和安全性,介绍一种患者选择和结果评估问卷,并提出一种手术技术改良方法。
28名身心正常的男性(25 - 35岁)因阴茎畸形恐惧症(主观认为阴茎短小)前来就诊,其中11人接受了以下手术:(a)阴茎延长术(耻骨上皮肤推进 - 韧带松解术):n = 5;(b)阴茎延长及阴茎体增粗术(游离真皮脂肪移植覆盖阴茎体):n = 3;(c)腹壁成形术 - 耻骨上脂肪切除术及阴茎延长术:n = 2。使用一份自我管理的问卷来帮助选择符合手术条件的患者并评估结果。此外,对真皮脂肪移植的处理应用了一项技术改良。
术后过程顺利,仅有轻微并发症。阴茎长度平均增加(疲软 - 拉伸阴茎)为1.6厘米(1 - 2.3厘米)[p = 0.0014],阴茎基部周长平均增加2.3厘米[p = 0.003],冠状沟下平均增加2.6厘米[p = 0.0012]。大多数(91%)患者报告性自尊和性功能有显著改善(20% - 53%)[p < 0.0001]。
尽管阴茎尺寸改变并不显著或未达到患者的“巨大”期望,但临床过程基本顺利,同时性自尊和性功能有显著改善,且患者对结果高度认可,这使得阴茎增大成形术对于严格筛选且充分知情的患有阴茎畸形恐惧症的年轻成年人来说是一种合理的治疗方式。