Parr Douglas
Greenpeace, Canonbury Villas, London, UK, N1 2PN.
Trends Biotechnol. 2005 Aug;23(8):395-8. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2005.06.001.
Nanotechnology could produce a revolutionary wave of innovation in society. The form that such a revolution might take will depend upon many things but certainly upon the context, content and purposes of research projects and agendas decided by existing political and corporate institutions. Lessons from the genetically modified organism debate indicate that the behaviour of these institutions is at least as important as the 'risk' in informing public acceptability. This article argues that current research priorities need to shift in favour of environmental and health protection to engender public support and/or an ongoing need to remain sensitive to emerging societal preferences.
纳米技术可能会在社会中引发一场革命性的创新浪潮。这场革命可能采取的形式将取决于许多因素,但肯定取决于现有政治和企业机构所决定的研究项目及议程的背景、内容和目的。转基因生物辩论的教训表明,这些机构的行为在告知公众可接受性方面至少与“风险”同样重要。本文认为,当前的研究重点需要转向有利于环境保护和健康保护,以获得公众支持,和/或持续需要对新出现的社会偏好保持敏感。