Bass Alan S, Tomaselli Gordon, Bullingham Roy, Kinter Lewis B
Investigational and Regulatory Safety Pharmacology, Schering-Plough Research Institute, Kenilworth, NJ 07033-0539, USA.
J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods. 2005 Jul-Aug;52(1):12-21. doi: 10.1016/j.vascn.2005.04.010.
A growing number of drugs and drug combinations inhibit cardiac potassium ion conductance and ventricular repolarization, and increase cardiac APD, QT interval, and risk of potentially fatal TdP. The past decade has seen an explosion of research advances into the mechanism of action underpinning these observations, and an unprecedented level of collaboration between academia, industry, and regulatory authorities to define effective strategies for accurate prediction of increased TdP risk (if any) in humans, based upon nonclinical and/or clinical endpoints. Because the incidence of TdP is so very low, even for drugs for which the association is known, the risk can only be assessed based upon surrogate markers (signals) in in vitro and in vivo non-clinical studies as well as in clinical trials. In this article, we review both the strengths and weaknesses of current methodologies and regulatory practices for assessment of TdP risk for pharmaceuticals.
越来越多的药物及药物组合会抑制心脏钾离子传导和心室复极化,并延长心脏动作电位时程(APD)、QT间期,以及增加潜在致命性尖端扭转型室性心动过速(TdP)的风险。在过去十年中,对于支撑这些观察结果的作用机制的研究取得了突破性进展,学术界、制药行业和监管机构之间开展了前所未有的合作,以确定基于非临床和/或临床终点准确预测人类TdP风险增加(若有)的有效策略。由于TdP的发生率非常低,即使对于已知存在关联的药物,也只能基于体外和体内非临床研究以及临床试验中的替代标志物(信号)来评估风险。在本文中,我们回顾了当前评估药物TdP风险的方法和监管实践的优缺点。