Han Ya-Ling, Yu Hai-Bo, Yan Cheng-Hui, Meng Zi-Min, Zhang Xiao-Lin, Kang Jian, Li Shao-Hua, Wang Shi-Wen
Department of Cardiology, General Hospital of Shenyang, The Institute of Cardiovascular Research, PLA, Shenyang 110016, China.
Sheng Li Xue Bao. 2005 Jun 25;57(3):295-302.
RhoA is one of the main members of RhoGTPase family involved in cell morphology, smooth muscle contraction, cytoskeletal microfilaments and stress fiber formation. It has been demonstrated that RhoA modulates endothelial cell permeability by its effect on F-actin rearrangement, but the molecular mechanism of rearrangement of actin cytoskeleton remains unclear. Recent studies prove that RhoA/Rho kinase regulates smooth muscle specific actin dynamics by activating serum response factor (SRF)-dependent transcription. To further investigate the molecular mechanism of the rearrangement of vascular endothelial cell actin cytoskeleton, we explored the relationship between the activation of SRF and F-actin rearrangement induced by RhoA in human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs). HUVECs were infected with the constitutively active forms of RhoA (Q63LRhoA) or the dominant negative forms of RhoA(T19NRhoA) using retrovirus vector pLNCX-Q63LRhoA or pLNCX-T19NRhoA, the positive clone was obtained by G418 selection. The expression and distribution of SRF in normal and infected cells were evaluated by immunohistochemistry and Western blot in complete medium and in serum-free medium. The effect of F-actin polymerization was detected by Rhodamine-Phalloidine staining. Infection of PLNCX-Q63LRhoA induced F-actin rearrangement and stress fiber formation in HUVECs, as well as enhanced the expression of SRF in the nuclei. In contrast, the cells infected with T19NRhoA showed no distinct changes. With serum deprivation, the expression of SRF increased obviously in both normal and infected HUVECs, but the subcellular localization of SRF was evidently different. In HUVECs, the localization of SRF was in the nuclei after 3 d with serum deprivation, but it was redistributed outside the nuclei after 5 d with serum deprivation. In cells infected with Q63LRhoA, the immunolocalization of SRF was always in the nuclei compared with HUVECs infected with T19NRhoA, which was almost always localized in the cytoplasm. In HUVECs, the rearrangement of F-actin and formation of stress fiber increased after 3 d with serum deprivation, but appeared decreased and unpolymerized after 5 d with serum deprivation. The polymerization of F-actin and the formation of stress fiber in HUVECs infected with Q63LRhoA kept during the period of serum-free culture, whereas the rearrangement of F-actin in cells infected with T19NRhoA was not found. These results suggest that RhoA influences endothelial F-actin rearrangement in part by regulating the expression and subcellular localization of SRF.
RhoA是RhoGTPase家族的主要成员之一,参与细胞形态、平滑肌收缩、细胞骨架微丝和应力纤维形成。已经证明,RhoA通过影响F-肌动蛋白重排来调节内皮细胞通透性,但肌动蛋白细胞骨架重排的分子机制仍不清楚。最近的研究证明,RhoA/Rho激酶通过激活血清反应因子(SRF)依赖性转录来调节平滑肌特异性肌动蛋白动力学。为了进一步研究血管内皮细胞肌动蛋白细胞骨架重排的分子机制,我们探讨了人脐静脉内皮细胞(HUVECs)中SRF激活与RhoA诱导的F-肌动蛋白重排之间的关系。使用逆转录病毒载体pLNCX-Q63LRhoA或pLNCX-T19NRhoA将组成型活性形式的RhoA(Q63LRhoA)或显性负性形式的RhoA(T19NRhoA)感染HUVECs,通过G418筛选获得阳性克隆。在完全培养基和无血清培养基中,通过免疫组织化学和蛋白质印迹法评估正常细胞和感染细胞中SRF的表达和分布。通过罗丹明-鬼笔环肽染色检测F-肌动蛋白聚合的影响。PLNCX-Q63LRhoA感染诱导HUVECs中F-肌动蛋白重排和应力纤维形成,以及增强细胞核中SRF的表达。相反,感染T19NRhoA的细胞没有明显变化。血清剥夺后,正常和感染的HUVECs中SRF的表达均明显增加,但SRF的亚细胞定位明显不同。在HUVECs中,血清剥夺3天后SRF定位于细胞核,但血清剥夺5天后SRF重新分布到细胞核外。与感染T19NRhoA的HUVECs相比,感染Q63LRhoA的细胞中SRF的免疫定位始终在细胞核中,而感染T19NRhoA的细胞几乎总是定位于细胞质中。在HUVECs中,血清剥夺3天后F-肌动蛋白重排和应力纤维形成增加,但血清剥夺5天后出现减少和未聚合。感染Q63LRhoA的HUVECs在无血清培养期间F-肌动蛋白聚合和应力纤维形成持续存在,而未发现感染T19NRhoA的细胞中F-肌动蛋白重排。这些结果表明,RhoA部分通过调节SRF的表达和亚细胞定位来影响内皮F-肌动蛋白重排。