• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

孟鲁司特在6至24个月大哮喘患者中的安全性、耐受性及探索性疗效

Safety, tolerability, and exploratory efficacy of montelukast in 6- to 24-month-old patients with asthma.

作者信息

van Adelsberg Janet, Moy James, Wei Lynn X, Tozzi Carol A, Knorr Barbara, Reiss Theodore F

机构信息

Merck Research Laboratories, Rahway, NJ 07065, USA.

出版信息

Curr Med Res Opin. 2005 Jun;21(6):971-9. doi: 10.1185/030079905X48456.

DOI:10.1185/030079905X48456
PMID:15969897
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine the safety and tolerability profile of montelukast 4-mg oral granules compared with placebo in children aged 6-24 months with asthma.

METHODS

This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study. Children 6-24 months of age at first visit with a history of at least three episodes of physician-diagnosed asthma or 'asthma-like' symptoms and in need of controller therapy were randomized to either montelukast 4-mg oral granules or placebo once daily in the evening for 6 weeks. The primary variables were the frequency of clinical and laboratory adverse experiences. The exploratory efficacy endpoints included days without beta-agonist use, beta-agonist use per day, unscheduled physician or hospital visits for asthma, oral corticosteroid rescues for asthma, asthma attacks, discontinuation due to worsening of asthma, and total blood peripheral eosinophil counts.

RESULTS

The most common clinical adverse experiences were upper respiratory tract infection, asthma, fever, diarrhea, and vomiting occurring with similar frequencies between treatment groups. There were no clinically meaningful differences between the two treatment groups in clinical or laboratory adverse experiences and no significant differences in frequency of patients with elevated serum transaminases. Differences between the montelukast and placebo treatment groups in the exploratory efficacy endpoints of days without beta-agonist use, oral corticosteroid rescues, emergency care, asthma attacks, and discontinuations due to worsening asthma were not significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Montelukast, 4-mg oral granules, was well tolerated over 6 weeks of treatment in children aged 6-24 months with asthma.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定与安慰剂相比,4毫克孟鲁司特口服颗粒剂在6至24个月哮喘儿童中的安全性和耐受性。

方法

这是一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、平行组研究。首次就诊时年龄在6至24个月、有至少三次医生诊断为哮喘或“哮喘样”症状病史且需要控制治疗的儿童,被随机分为每晚一次服用4毫克孟鲁司特口服颗粒剂或安慰剂,为期6周。主要变量为临床和实验室不良事件的发生频率。探索性疗效终点包括无β受体激动剂使用天数、每日β受体激动剂使用量、因哮喘进行的非计划医生就诊或住院次数、哮喘的口服糖皮质激素挽救治疗、哮喘发作、因哮喘恶化而停药以及外周血嗜酸性粒细胞总数。

结果

最常见的临床不良事件是上呼吸道感染、哮喘、发热、腹泻和呕吐,治疗组之间的发生频率相似。两组在临床或实验室不良事件方面无临床意义上的差异,血清转氨酶升高患者的频率也无显著差异。孟鲁司特和安慰剂治疗组在无β受体激动剂使用天数、口服糖皮质激素挽救治疗、急诊、哮喘发作以及因哮喘恶化而停药等探索性疗效终点方面的差异不显著。

结论

在6至24个月哮喘儿童中,4毫克孟鲁司特口服颗粒剂在6周治疗期间耐受性良好。

相似文献

1
Safety, tolerability, and exploratory efficacy of montelukast in 6- to 24-month-old patients with asthma.孟鲁司特在6至24个月大哮喘患者中的安全性、耐受性及探索性疗效
Curr Med Res Opin. 2005 Jun;21(6):971-9. doi: 10.1185/030079905X48456.
2
Efficacy and tolerability of salmeterol/fluticasone propionate versus montelukast in childhood asthma: A prospective, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group study.沙美特罗/丙酸氟替卡松与孟鲁司特治疗儿童哮喘的疗效和耐受性:一项前瞻性、随机、双盲、双模拟、平行组研究。
Clin Ther. 2008 Aug;30(8):1492-504. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2008.07.018.
3
Montelukast, a leukotriene receptor antagonist, for the treatment of persistent asthma in children aged 2 to 5 years.孟鲁司特,一种白三烯受体拮抗剂,用于治疗2至5岁儿童的持续性哮喘。
Pediatrics. 2001 Sep;108(3):E48. doi: 10.1542/peds.108.3.e48.
4
Comparative study of budesonide inhalation suspension and montelukast in young children with mild persistent asthma.布地奈德吸入混悬液与孟鲁司特治疗轻度持续性哮喘幼儿的对比研究
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007 Nov;120(5):1043-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2007.08.063.
5
Oral montelukast versus inhaled beclomethasone in 6- to 11-year-old children with asthma: results of an open-label extension study evaluating long-term safety, satisfaction, and adherence with therapy.6至11岁哮喘儿童口服孟鲁司特与吸入倍氯米松的比较:一项评估长期安全性、满意度和治疗依从性的开放标签扩展研究结果
Curr Med Res Opin. 2001;17(2):96-104.
6
Safety and tolerability of montelukast in placebo-controlled pediatric studies and their open-label extensions.孟鲁司特在安慰剂对照儿科研究及其开放标签扩展研究中的安全性和耐受性。
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2009 Jun;44(6):568-79. doi: 10.1002/ppul.21018.
7
Montelukast reduces asthma exacerbations in 2- to 5-year-old children with intermittent asthma.孟鲁司特可减少2至5岁间歇性哮喘儿童的哮喘发作。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005 Feb 15;171(4):315-22. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200407-894OC. Epub 2004 Nov 12.
8
Attenuation of the September epidemic of asthma exacerbations in children: a randomized, controlled trial of montelukast added to usual therapy.儿童9月哮喘加重流行的缓解:一项在常规治疗基础上加用孟鲁司特的随机对照试验。
Pediatrics. 2007 Sep;120(3):e702-12. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-3317.
9
The efficacy of montelukast during the allergy season in pediatric patients with persistent asthma and seasonal aeroallergen sensitivity.孟鲁司特在过敏季节对患有持续性哮喘和季节性气传过敏原敏感的儿科患者的疗效。
J Asthma. 2009 May;46(4):413-20. doi: 10.1080/02770900902847727.
10
Pharmacokinetics and safety of montelukast oral granules in children 1 to 3 months of age with bronchiolitis.孟鲁司特口服颗粒剂在1至3个月大患细支气管炎儿童中的药代动力学及安全性
J Clin Pharmacol. 2008 Apr;48(4):502-11. doi: 10.1177/0091270008314251. Epub 2008 Feb 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Establishing the best step-up treatments for children with uncontrolled asthma despite inhaled corticosteroids: the EINSTEIN systematic review, network meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis using individual participant data.确定对于尽管使用吸入性糖皮质激素但哮喘仍未得到控制的儿童的最佳升级治疗方案:爱因斯坦系统评价、网状荟萃分析及使用个体参与者数据的成本效益分析
Health Technol Assess. 2025 May;29(15):1-234. doi: 10.3310/HGWT3617.
2
Management of Preschool Wheezing: Guideline from the Emilia-Romagna Asthma (ERA) Study Group.学龄前喘息的管理:来自艾米利亚-罗马涅哮喘(ERA)研究组的指南
J Clin Med. 2022 Aug 15;11(16):4763. doi: 10.3390/jcm11164763.
3
A systematic review of adverse drug events associated with administration of common asthma medications in children.
对儿童使用常见哮喘药物相关不良药物事件的系统评价。
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 9;12(8):e0182738. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182738. eCollection 2017.
4
Benefits and Risks of Long-Term Asthma Management in Children: Where Are We Heading?儿童长期哮喘管理的益处与风险:我们正走向何方?
Drug Saf. 2017 Mar;40(3):201-210. doi: 10.1007/s40264-016-0483-0.
5
Leukotriene receptor antagonists as maintenance and intermittent therapy for episodic viral wheeze in children.白三烯受体拮抗剂作为儿童发作性病毒性喘息的维持和间歇治疗药物。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Oct 19;2015(10):CD008202. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008202.pub2.
6
Clinical effectiveness and safety of montelukast in asthma. What are the conclusions from clinical trials and meta-analyses?孟鲁司特在哮喘治疗中的临床疗效与安全性。临床试验和荟萃分析得出了哪些结论?
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2014 Jun 26;8:839-50. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S39100. eCollection 2014.
7
Adverse drug reactions associated with asthma medications in children: systematic review of clinical trials.儿童哮喘药物相关的药物不良反应:临床试验系统评价。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2014 Apr;36(2):243-52. doi: 10.1007/s11096-014-9924-y. Epub 2014 Feb 23.
8
Montelukast as Monotherapy for Pediatric Asthma.孟鲁司特作为儿童哮喘的单一疗法
MP Med Prakt Pediatr. 2009;3(63):20-23.
9
Montelukast versus inhaled corticosteroids in the management of pediatric mild persistent asthma.孟鲁司特与吸入性糖皮质激素治疗小儿轻度持续性哮喘的对比研究
Multidiscip Respir Med. 2012 Jul 5;7(1):13. doi: 10.1186/2049-6958-7-13.
10
Role of leukotriene receptor antagonists in the management of pediatric asthma: an update.白三烯受体拮抗剂在小儿哮喘管理中的作用:更新。
Paediatr Drugs. 2012 Oct 1;14(5):317-30. doi: 10.2165/11599930-000000000-00000.