Glass Anne, Henning Jeannette, Karopka Thomas, Scheel Thomas, Bansemer Sven, Koczan Dirk, Gierl Lothar, Rolfs Arndt, Gimsa Ulrike
Institute for Medical Informatics and Biometry, University of Rostock, Medical Faculty, Germany.
Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2005 Jun;69(6):1098-103. doi: 10.1271/bbb.69.1098.
Designing microarray experiments, scientists are often confronted with the question of pooling due to financial constraints, but discussion of the validity of pooling tends toward a sub-pooling recommendation. Since complete pooling protocols can be considered part of sub-pooling designs, gene expression data from three complete pooling experiments were analyzed. Data from complete pooled versus individual mRNA samples of rat brain tissue were compared to answer the question whether the pooled sample represents individual samples in small-sized experiments. Our analytic approach provided clear results concerning the Affymetrix MAS 5.0 signal and detection call parameters. Despite a strong similarity of arrays within experimental groups, the individual signals were evidently not appropriately represented in the pooled sample, with slightly more than half of all the genes considered. Our analysis reveals problems in cases of small complete pooling designs with less than six subjects pooled.
在设计微阵列实验时,由于资金限制,科学家们常常面临样本合并的问题,但关于合并有效性的讨论往往倾向于推荐子样本合并。由于完全合并方案可被视为子样本合并设计的一部分,因此对来自三个完全合并实验的基因表达数据进行了分析。将大鼠脑组织完全合并样本与单个mRNA样本的数据进行比较,以回答在小规模实验中合并样本是否能代表单个样本的问题。我们的分析方法就Affymetrix MAS 5.0信号和检测调用参数给出了明确结果。尽管实验组内的阵列具有很强的相似性,但在合并样本中,个体信号显然没有得到恰当体现,在所有被考虑的基因中,只有略多于一半的基因得到体现。我们的分析揭示了在少于六个样本合并的小型完全合并设计中存在的问题。