Thomas D, Pickup S, Zhou R, Glickson J, Ferrari V A
Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Rofo. 2005 Jul;177(7):975-85. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-858269.
To compare strain analysis and wall thickening (WT) analysis in differentiating the infarcted, adjacent, and remote zones in a rat model of myocardial infarction (MI).
Three normal (NL) and ten rats subjected to myocardial infarction were imaged on a 4.7T scanner. Gradient-echo and SPAMM-tagged cine images were acquired at three short axis levels of the left ventricle (LV). A homogenous strain analysis (principal strains lambda1 and lambda2, displacement D, angle beta) and a WT-analysis (mm- and %-thickening) were performed in all slices demonstrating MI. Regional function was compared between infarcted rats (infarcted, adjacent and remote zone) and corresponding regions in the NL rats. Additional segmental analysis was performed in the NL rats for the anterior, lateral, inferior and septal wall.
In the NL rats, lambda (1) (greatest radial thickening) was greatest in the lateral and anterior wall. WT-analysis showed a pattern of function similar to lambda1, however, regional differences using WT-analysis were not significant. lambda (2) (greatest circumferential shortening) was most negative in the anterior wall. D was greatest in the lateral and inferior wall. The angle beta was radially directed in all segments. In the infarcted rats, both strain and WT-analyses revealed significant impairment in function in the infarcted and adjacent zones as compared to NL (p < 0.001). However, only the strain analysis (lambda1, lambda2, p < 0.001) detected significant remote myocardial dysfunction. Myocardial function differed significantly between the infarcted and adjacent and between the infarcted and remote regions. Strain analysis (lambda2, D, beta, p < 0.001) also identified significant functional differences between the adjacent and remote zones, however, no statistically significant differences were found using WT-analysis.
Strain analysis is superior to WT-analysis in detecting regional functional variations in NL rats and in discriminating function in the infarcted, adjacent and remote zones post MI.
比较应变分析和壁增厚(WT)分析在鉴别大鼠心肌梗死(MI)模型中梗死区、相邻区和远隔区的作用。
对3只正常(NL)大鼠和10只经历心肌梗死的大鼠在4.7T扫描仪上进行成像。在左心室(LV)的三个短轴水平采集梯度回波和SPAMM标记的电影图像。对所有显示MI的切片进行均匀应变分析(主应变λ1和λ2、位移D、角度β)和WT分析(毫米增厚和百分比增厚)。比较梗死大鼠(梗死区、相邻区和远隔区)与NL大鼠相应区域的局部功能。对NL大鼠的前壁、侧壁、下壁和室间隔进行额外的节段分析。
在NL大鼠中,λ1(最大径向增厚)在侧壁和前壁最大。WT分析显示出与λ1相似的功能模式,然而,使用WT分析的区域差异不显著。λ2(最大圆周缩短)在前壁最负。D在侧壁和下壁最大。角度β在所有节段均呈径向。在梗死大鼠中,与NL相比,应变分析和WT分析均显示梗死区和相邻区功能有显著损害(p<0.001)。然而,只有应变分析(λ1、λ2,p<0.001)检测到远隔心肌功能障碍显著。梗死区与相邻区以及梗死区与远隔区之间的心肌功能有显著差异。应变分析(λ2、D、β,p<0.001)也确定了相邻区和远隔区之间存在显著的功能差异,然而,使用WT分析未发现统计学显著差异。
在检测NL大鼠的局部功能变化以及鉴别MI后梗死区、相邻区和远隔区的功能方面,应变分析优于WT分析。