Suppr超能文献

应变编码(SENC)磁共振成像评估健康志愿者心肌应变的区域异质性:与传统标记法的比较

Strain-encoded (SENC) magnetic resonance imaging to evaluate regional heterogeneity of myocardial strain in healthy volunteers: Comparison with conventional tagging.

作者信息

Neizel Mirja, Lossnitzer Dirk, Korosoglou Grigorios, Schäufele Tim, Lewien Antje, Steen Henning, Katus Hugo A, Osman Nael F, Giannitsis Evangelos

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

J Magn Reson Imaging. 2009 Jan;29(1):99-105. doi: 10.1002/jmri.21612.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the ability of strain-encoded (SENC) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for regional systolic and diastolic strain analysis of the myocardium in healthy volunteers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Circumferential and longitudinal peak systolic strain values of 75 healthy volunteers (35 women and 40 men, mean age 44 +/- 12 years) were measured using SENC at 1.5T. MR tagging was used as the reference standard for measuring regional function. Diastolic function was assessed in the 10 youngest (24 +/- 8 years) and 10 oldest (62 +/- 5 years) subjects.

RESULTS

Peak strain values assessed with SENC were comparable to those obtained by MR tagging, showing narrow limits of agreement (limits of agreement -5.6% to 8.1%). Regional heterogeneity was observed between different segments of the left ventricle (LV) by both techniques (P < 0.001). Longitudinal strain obtained by SENC was also heterogenous (P < 0.001). Interestingly, no age- or gender-specific differences in peak systolic strain were observed, whereas the peak rate of relaxation of circumferential strain rate was decreased in the older group.

CONCLUSION

SENC is a reliable tool for accurate and objective quantification of regional myocardial systolic as well as diastolic function. In agreement with tagged MRI, SENC detected slightly heterogeneous myocardial strain within LV segments.

摘要

目的

评估应变编码(SENC)磁共振成像(MRI)对健康志愿者心肌区域收缩期和舒张期应变分析的能力。

材料与方法

使用1.5T的SENC测量75名健康志愿者(35名女性和40名男性,平均年龄44±12岁)的圆周和纵向收缩期峰值应变值。磁共振标记用作测量区域功能的参考标准。对10名最年轻(24±8岁)和10名最年长(62±5岁)的受试者进行舒张功能评估。

结果

用SENC评估的峰值应变值与通过磁共振标记获得的值相当,显示出较窄的一致性界限(一致性界限为-5.6%至8.1%)。两种技术均观察到左心室(LV)不同节段之间存在区域异质性(P<0.001)。通过SENC获得的纵向应变也存在异质性(P<0.001)。有趣的是,未观察到收缩期峰值应变存在年龄或性别特异性差异,而老年组圆周应变率的峰值松弛率降低。

结论

SENC是准确、客观量化心肌区域收缩期和舒张期功能的可靠工具。与标记MRI一致,SENC检测到LV节段内心肌应变略有异质性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验