Gralla Richard J, de Wit Ronald, Herrstedt Jorn, Carides Alexandra D, Ianus Juliana, Guoguang-Ma Julie, Evans Judith K, Horgan Kevin J
New York Lung Cancer Alliance, New York, NY 10027, USA.
Cancer. 2005 Aug 15;104(4):864-8. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21222.
The tendency of chemotherapeutic regimens to cause vomiting is dependent on the individual drugs in the regimen. The authors analyzed data combined from 2 Phase III trials to assess the effect of the neurokinin-1 (NK(1)) antagonist aprepitant combined with a 5HT(3) antagonist plus a corticosteroid in a subpopulation receiving > 1 emetogenic chemotherapeutic agent.
In the current study, 1043 cisplatin-naive patients (42% were women) receiving cisplatin-based (> or = 70 mg/m(2)) chemotherapy were assigned randomly to a control regimen (ondansetron [O] 32 mg intravenously and dexamethasone [D] 20 mg orally on Day 1; D 8 mg twice daily on Days 2-4) or an aprepitant (A) regimen (A 125 mg orally plus O 32 mg and D 12 mg on Day 1; A 80 mg and D 8 mg once daily on Days 2-3; and D 8 mg on Day 4). Randomization was stratified for use of concomitant chemotherapy and female gender. The primary end point was complete response (no vomiting and no rescue therapy) on Days 1-5 (0-120 hours). Data were analyzed by a modified intent-to-treat approach, and logistic regression was used to make treatment comparisons among patients receiving the most frequently coadministered emetogenic concomitant chemotherapy (Hesketh level > or = 3).
Among the approximately 13% of patients (n = 81 for A; n = 80 for control) who received additional emetogenic chemotherapy (doxorubicin or cyclophosphamide), the aprepitant regimen provided a 33 percentage-point improvement in the complete response rate compared with the control regimen. Among the general population, the advantage with aprepitant was 20 percentage points.
The current analysis of > 1000 patients from 2 large randomized trials showed that in the subpopulation at increased risk of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting due to concomitant emetogenic chemotherapy, the addition of aprepitant to standard antiemetics improved protection to an even greater extent than in the general study population.
化疗方案导致呕吐的倾向取决于方案中的具体药物。作者分析了两项Ⅲ期试验合并的数据,以评估神经激肽-1(NK(1))拮抗剂阿瑞匹坦联合5HT(3)拮抗剂及皮质类固醇在接受一种以上致吐性化疗药物的亚组人群中的效果。
在本研究中,1043例未接受过顺铂治疗的患者(42%为女性)接受基于顺铂(≥70mg/m(2))的化疗,被随机分配至对照方案(第1天静脉注射昂丹司琼[O]32mg及口服地塞米松[D]20mg;第2 - 4天D 8mg,每日两次)或阿瑞匹坦(A)方案(第1天口服A 125mg加O 32mg及D 12mg;第2 - 3天A 80mg及D 8mg,每日一次;第4天D 8mg)。随机分组按是否使用联合化疗及女性性别进行分层。主要终点为第1 - 5天(0 - 120小时)的完全缓解(无呕吐且未接受解救治疗)。数据采用改良意向性分析方法进行分析,并采用逻辑回归对接受最常联合使用的致吐性联合化疗(赫斯基等级≥3)的患者进行治疗比较。
在接受额外致吐性化疗(多柔比星或环磷酰胺)的约13%的患者中(A组n = 81;对照组n = 80),与对照方案相比,阿瑞匹坦方案的完全缓解率提高了33个百分点。在总体人群中,阿瑞匹坦的优势为20个百分点。
目前对来自两项大型随机试验的1000多名患者的分析表明,在因联合致吐性化疗而化疗引起的恶心和呕吐风险增加的亚组人群中,在标准止吐药基础上加用阿瑞匹坦比在总体研究人群中能提供更大程度的保护。